Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring #3576

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Refactoring #3576

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tosemml
Copy link

@tosemml tosemml commented Aug 25, 2023

This minor update aims to enhance the code's Pythonic nature and conciseness by employing set intersection.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 25, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/audio/3576

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tosemml!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Meta Open Source project. Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@mthrok mthrok left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi

Thanks for proposing the change, however, I don't think this is improving the readability, while it can potentially consume a way more memory at set(transcript.split()).

@tosemml
Copy link
Author

tosemml commented Sep 2, 2023

Thank you for your comment. This change is intended to encourage the use of Python idioms, which is a commonly recommended practice.

@mthrok
Copy link
Collaborator

mthrok commented Sep 7, 2023

Thank you for your comment. This change is intended to encourage the use of Python idioms, which is a commonly recommended practice.

I am not convinced that just using set makes the code more Pythonic. I'd reorganize the logic of the entire helper function, rather than focusing on one line.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants