Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix inheritance resolution of cached properties in slotted class #1289

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dlax
Copy link
Contributor

@dlax dlax commented Jun 3, 2024

Summary

This resolves the case where a sub-class of a slotted class defining some cached properties has a custom __getattr__() method, illustrated in #1288 (but not exactly the same example, rather #1288 (comment)). In that case, we need to build the custom __getattr__ implementation (see in _make_cached_property_getattr()) using cached properties from all classes in the MRO. In order to keep references of cached properties defined the inheritance hierarchy, we store them in a new __attrs_cached_properties__ attribute and finally build the cached_properties value, passed to _make_cached_property_getattr(), by combining current class' cached properties with that of all its parents. Also, when building __attrs_cached_properties__, we now clear current class' __dict__ (name cd), thus saving an extra loop.

Pull Request Check List

  • Do not open pull requests from your main branch – use a separate branch!
    • There's a ton of footguns waiting if you don't heed this warning. You can still go back to your project, create a branch from your main branch, push it, and open the pull request from the new branch.
    • This is not a pre-requisite for your your pull request to be accepted, but you have been warned.
  • Added tests for changed code.
    Our CI fails if coverage is not 100%.
  • New features have been added to our Hypothesis testing strategy.
  • Changes or additions to public APIs are reflected in our type stubs (files ending in .pyi).
    • ...and used in the stub test file tests/typing_example.py.
    • If they've been added to attr/__init__.pyi, they've also been re-imported in attrs/__init__.pyi.
  • Updated documentation for changed code.
    • New functions/classes have to be added to docs/api.rst by hand.
    • Changes to the signature of @attr.s() have to be added by hand too.
    • Changed/added classes/methods/functions have appropriate versionadded, versionchanged, or deprecated directives.
      The next version is the second number in the current release + 1.
      The first number represents the current year.
      So if the current version on PyPI is 22.2.0, the next version is gonna be 22.3.0.
      If the next version is the first in the new year, it'll be 23.1.0.
  • Documentation in .rst and .md files is written using semantic newlines.
  • Changes (and possible deprecations) have news fragments in changelog.d.
  • Consider granting push permissions to the PR branch, so maintainers can fix minor issues themselves without pestering you.

@dlax dlax force-pushed the issue1288 branch 2 times, most recently from c46ffe5 to 31a554a Compare June 3, 2024 10:01
@dlax dlax marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2024 10:03
@dlax dlax marked this pull request as draft June 3, 2024 10:05
This resolves the case where a sub-class of a slotted class defining
some cached properties has a custom __getattr__() method. In that case,
we need to build the custom __getattr__ implementation (see
in _make_cached_property_getattr()) using cached properties from all
classes in the MRO. In order to keep references of cached properties
defined the inheritance hierarchy, we store them in a new
__attrs_cached_properties__ attribute and finally build the
"cached_properties" value, passed to _make_cached_property_getattr(),
by combining current class' cached properties with that of all its
parents. Also, when building __attrs_cached_properties__, we now clear
current class' __dict__ (name 'cd'), thus saving an extra loop.

See python-attrs#1288
@dlax
Copy link
Contributor Author

dlax commented Jun 3, 2024

Closing in favour of #1291

@dlax dlax closed this Jun 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant