Bind functions for dealing with sigalgs

[Jean-Daniel]

Fixes #7336

[alex]

thanks for sending this, looks like we need to expand the conditional to handle boringssl

[Jean-Daniel]

Looking at BoringSSL history, they stated that SSL_get_sigalgs was "not terribly useful of APIs", and so decided to remove it long time ago.

Should we remove it too from this patch and only expose SSL_CTX_set1_sigalgs_list, or should we disable both functions and set Cryptography_HAS_SIGALGS to 0 when using BoringSSL ?

[alex]

If we don't need it for pyOpenSSL I'd say let's bind only the set function.

…

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 5:33 PM Jean-Daniel ***@***.***> wrote: Looking at BoringSSL history, they stated that SSL_get_sigalgs was "not terribly useful of APIs", and so decided to remove it long time ago. Should we remove it too from this patch and only expose SSL_CTX_set1_sigalgs_list, or should we disable both functions and set Cryptography_HAS_SIGALGS to 0 when using BoringSSL ? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7349 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAAGBGV2PWORNSJDEEK72TVP6GZHANCNFSM5ZG6LKOQ> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing.

[alex]

Thanks!