Skip to content

Conversation

@eddyzags
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PR aims to add capabilities to forward requests to HTTP and a WebSocket server in the relayminer.

It sets up a configurable authenticated endpoint (/services/{service_id}/forward) whose responsibility would be to forward raw requests from the Relay Server to the service ID (more precisely, service node or data node).

Issue

Type of change

Select one or more from the following:

Sanity Checklist

  • I have updated the GitHub Issue assignees, reviewers, labels, project, iteration and milestone
  • For docs, I have run make docusaurus_start
  • For code, I have run make go_develop_and_test and make test_e2e
  • For code, I have added the devnet-test-e2e label to run E2E tests in CI
  • For configurations, I have update the documentation
  • I added TODOs where applicable

@eddyzags eddyzags self-assigned this Jul 17, 2025
@eddyzags eddyzags added relayminer Changes related to the Relayminer tooling Tooling - CLI, scripts, helpers, off-chain, etc... community A ticket intended to potentially be picked up by a community member nice-to-have Not-important and not-urgent labels Jul 17, 2025
@eddyzags eddyzags force-pushed the feat/relayminer-forward-v2 branch from 0438728 to b9c72b9 Compare July 21, 2025 17:47
@eddyzags
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping @bryanchriswhite 👋🏾

@Olshansk Olshansk added this to Shannon Jul 29, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📋 Backlog in Shannon Jul 29, 2025
@Olshansk Olshansk moved this from 📋 Backlog to 👀 In review in Shannon Jul 29, 2025
@Olshansk Olshansk requested review from jorgecuesta and removed request for red-0ne July 31, 2025 13:55
@Olshansk
Copy link
Collaborator

@jorgecuesta If you have some spare cycles, I'd really appreciate your thoughts/feedback/input on this feature!

I've personally done a few rounds of review on the previous implementation of this, but am looking for a Supplier's perspective in terms of the product/feature.

@jorgecuesta
Copy link
Contributor

@jorgecuesta If you have some spare cycles, I'd really appreciate your thoughts/feedback/input on this feature!

I've personally done a few rounds of review on the previous implementation of this, but am looking for a Supplier's perspective in terms of the product/feature.

I can take a look on this into the weekend or Monday since I'm currently OOO right now.

@Olshansk Olshansk marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2025 20:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community A ticket intended to potentially be picked up by a community member nice-to-have Not-important and not-urgent relayminer Changes related to the Relayminer tooling Tooling - CLI, scripts, helpers, off-chain, etc...

Projects

Status: 👀 In review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants