OWNERS: Auto Sync OWNERS files from community membership #21741
Conversation
[skip ci] Update OWNERS file skip-checks: true Signed-off-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
[skip ci] Update OWNERS file skip-checks: true Signed-off-by: Ti Chi Robot <[email protected]>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
missing-translation-status
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request streamlines the management of approvers and reviewers by transitioning from explicit, per-file lists to a more centralized, alias-based system. This change aims to simplify the synchronization of community membership into the OWNERS files, making it more efficient to manage and update roles across the repository by referencing defined community groups.
Highlights
- Centralized OWNERS Management: The
OWNERSfile has been refactored to usefiltersthat referencesig-community-approversandsig-community-reviewersaliases, moving away from direct listings of individual members. - Defined Community Aliases: New aliases,
sig-community-approversandsig-community-reviewers, have been added toOWNERS_ALIASES, encapsulating the previously listed individual members for easier management. - Updated Documentation and Syncing Information: Comments in both
OWNERSandOWNERS_ALIASESfiles have been updated to point to thekubernetes.devdocumentation and clarify that members are synced from thepingcap/communityrepository.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
the
size/M
|
/release-note-none |
ti-chi-bot
added
approved
lgtm
skip-issue-check
ti-chi-bot
bot
removed
the
missing-translation-status
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the OWNERS and OWNERS_ALIASES files to centralize community membership, which improves maintainability. The changes correctly implement the use of aliases for approvers and reviewers. My feedback includes minor suggestions to sort the member lists alphabetically for better readability and easier management.
| - 3pointer | ||
| - GMHDBJD | ||
| - Joyinqin | ||
| - KanShiori | ||
| - Yisaer | ||
| - amyangfei | ||
| - anotherrachel | ||
| - aylei | ||
| - crazycs520 | ||
| - dveeden | ||
| - ericsyh | ||
| - glkappe | ||
| - junlan-zhang | ||
| - lucklove | ||
| - lysu | ||
| - ngaut | ||
| - superlzs0476 | ||
| - tiancaiamao | ||
| - weekface | ||
| - zimulala |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better readability and easier maintenance, it's a good practice to keep lists of usernames sorted alphabetically.
- 3pointer
- amyangfei
- anotherrachel
- aylei
- crazycs520
- dveeden
- ericsyh
- glkappe
- GMHDBJD
- Joyinqin
- junlan-zhang
- KanShiori
- lucklove
- lysu
- ngaut
- superlzs0476
- tiancaiamao
- weekface
- Yisaer
- zimulala
| - Icemap | ||
| - Oreoxmt | ||
| - breezewish | ||
| - csuzhangxc | ||
| - hfxsd | ||
| - jackysp | ||
| - kissmydb | ||
| - lance6716 | ||
| - lilin90 | ||
| - overvenus | ||
| - qiancai | ||
| - tangenta |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For better readability and easier maintenance, it's a good practice to keep lists of usernames sorted alphabetically.
- breezewish
- csuzhangxc
- hfxsd
- Icemap
- jackysp
- kissmydb
- lance6716
- lilin90
- Oreoxmt
- overvenus
- qiancai
- tangenta
Check List
Tests