Closes #39: CoEQ test data

[manciniedoardo]

Thank you for your Pull Request! We have developed this task checklist from the Development Process Guide to help with the final steps of the process. Completing the below tasks helps to ensure our reviewers can maximize their time on your code as well as making sure the admiral family codebase remains robust and consistent.

Please check off each taskbox as an acknowledgment that you completed the task or check off that it is not relevant to your Pull Request. This checklist is part of the Github Action workflows and the Pull Request will not be merged into the main branch until you have checked off each task.

• Place Closes #<insert_issue_number> into the beginning of your Pull Request Title (Use Edit button in top-right if you need to update)
• Code is formatted according to the tidyverse style guide. Run styler::style_file() to style R and Rmd files
• Updated relevant unit tests or have written new unit tests, which should consider realistic data scenarios and edge cases, e.g. empty datasets, errors, boundary cases etc. - See Unit Test Guide
• If you removed/replaced any function and/or function parameters, did you fully follow the deprecation guidance?
• Update to all relevant roxygen headers and examples, including keywords and families. Refer to the categorization of functions to tag appropriate keyword/family.
• Run devtools::document() so all .Rd files in the man folder and the NAMESPACE file in the project root are updated appropriately
• Address any updates needed for vignettes and/or templates
• Update NEWS.md under the header # admiral<ext> (development version) if the changes pertain to a user-facing function (i.e. it has an @export tag) or documentation aimed at users (rather than developers)
• Build site pkgdown::build_site() and check that all affected examples are displayed correctly and that all new functions occur on the Reference page.
• Address or fix all lintr warnings and errors - lintr::lint_package()
• Run R CMD check locally and address all errors and warnings - devtools::check()
• Link the issue in the Development Section on the right hand side.
• Address all merge conflicts and resolve appropriately
• Pat yourself on the back for a job well done! Much love to your accomplishment!

[github-actions]

Package	Line Rate	Health
admiralmetabolic	100%	✔
Summary	100% (3 / 3)	✔

[manciniedoardo]

Hi @pharmaverse/admiralmetabolic - this is a PR to add a very simple CoEQ test dataset. I have added a couple of reviewers, but could anyone with capacity please take a look and see if the SDTM structure makes sense to you? I have not worked myself with the data and the only thing I had access to was some raw, unmapped data from the Roche side, so I had to "guess" the SDTM mapping! In particular, I also guessed the QSCAT/QSSCAT/QSTEST assignments, but of course we can modify them if needed.

@kathrinflunkert note that I have added the licensing disclaimer as well, which we'll need to send to UoLeeds before we merge in.

[AndersAskeland]

Thanks for the PR! I don't have much as I don't know the specific of actually using CoEQ.

I have a couple of things I would prefer being changed over to tidyverse, but besides that it looks good! :)

[AndersAskeland]

I would propose this small change in library calls.

[manciniedoardo]

Thanks @kathrinflunkert @yurovska for your reviews. I removed QSSCAT, ensured the answer to question 20 is categorical, and made the other suggested updates. Please review again - looking to merge by EoB Wed this week. Thanks!

Note that checks are failing due to some issue in admiralci, not anything here.

[yurovska]

@manciniedoardo Thanks for the updates. Just one pedantic comment, otherwise looks good to me.

[AndersAskeland]

LGTM! Thanks @manciniedoardo !

[kathrinflunkert]

Many thanks for the updates!