feat: Update warning styles and add recipient accuracy reminder in forms #231
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
WalkthroughAdds an editable recipient-name flow and an inline recipient safety alert to RecipientDetailsForm. Provider response "Ok" (case-insensitive) enables manual account-name entry (clears name/errors) and shows a learn-more alert; verified responses populate a read-only name. TransactionForm only has whitespace changes. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Form as RecipientDetailsForm
participant API as Verification API
participant Analytics
User->>Form: Enter account number / select institution
Form->>API: verifyAccount(accountNumber, institution)
API-->>Form: response (verified name / "Ok" / error)
alt API returns "Ok" (manual entry required)
Form->>Form: set isRecipientNameEditable = true and clear recipientName/errors
Form-->>User: Render editable Account Name input + RecipientAlert
Form->>Analytics: trackEvent recipient_alert_viewed
User->>Form: Click "Learn more"
Form->>Analytics: trackEvent recipient_alert_learn_more_clicked
User->>Form: Type account name
Form->>Form: validate recipientName
else API returns verified name
Form->>Form: set recipientName, isRecipientNameEditable = false
Form-->>User: Show verified (read-only) name + RecipientAlert
Form->>Analytics: trackEvent recipient_alert_viewed
else API error
Form->>Form: set recipientNameError, isRecipientNameEditable = false
Form-->>User: Show verification error (no alert)
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx(9 hunks)app/pages/TransactionForm.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (3)
app/components/AnimatedComponents.tsx (1)
AnimatedFeedbackItem(275-288)app/utils.ts (1)
classNames(22-24)app/components/InputError.tsx (1)
InputError(5-20)
…ecipient name editability
… recipient name verification
Dprof-in-tech
commented
Nov 6, 2025
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-10-10T16:44:32.125Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 244
File: app/components/CopyAddressWarningModal.tsx:48-52
Timestamp: 2025-10-10T16:44:32.125Z
Learning: In the CopyAddressWarningModal component (app/components/CopyAddressWarningModal.tsx), selectedNetwork from useNetwork() is always defined and does not require null safety checks when accessing its properties like selectedNetwork.chain.name.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (3)
app/components/AnimatedComponents.tsx (1)
AnimatedFeedbackItem(275-288)app/utils.ts (1)
classNames(22-24)app/components/InputError.tsx (1)
InputError(5-20)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (7)
5-5: LGTM!The
InformationSquareIconimport is correctly added and used in the warning banners below.
61-61: LGTM!The state declaration for tracking editable recipient name is correct and properly initialized.
128-128: LGTM!Correctly disables manual entry mode when selecting a saved recipient with a pre-verified name.
243-243: LGTM!Correctly resets the editable state when the institution changes, ensuring clean state for new verification.
283-284: LGTM!Correctly disables manual entry and displays an error message when account name verification fails.
332-332: LGTM!Correctly resets the editable state when clearing all recipient details.
434-459: LGTM!The conditional rendering for editable vs verified recipient name is well-implemented with proper validation and error handling.
Dprof-in-tech
commented
Nov 6, 2025
…recipient name based on error state
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (1)
494-511: Alert condition is incomplete and misses validation error state.The alert conditions on lines 495 and 503 don't check for form validation errors (
errors.recipientName) or the fetching state. Per the PR objectives: "Alert is shown only when recipientName is present and there is no recipientNameError; validation/error state takes precedence."When a user enters an invalid name (e.g., 1 character),
recipientNamewill contain that value ANDerrors.recipientNamewill be set, yet the alert will still render. The previous review comment identified this exact issue.Apply this diff to fix the conditions:
- <AnimatedFeedbackItem> - {isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError && ( + {recipientName && !recipientNameError && !errors.recipientName && !isFetchingRecipientName && ( + <AnimatedFeedbackItem> + {isRecipientNameEditable ? ( <div className="min-h-[48px] h-fit w-full dark:bg-warning-background/10 bg-warning-background/35 px-3 py-2 rounded-xl flex items-start gap-2"> <InformationSquareIcon className="dark:text-warning-text text-warning-foreground w-[36px] h-[36px] md:w-[24px] md:h-[24px]" /> <p className="text-xs font-light dark:text-warning-text text-warning-foreground leading-tight"> Unable to verify details. Ensure the recipient's account number is accurate before proceeding with swap. <a href="#" className="text-lavender-500 text-semibold">Learn more.</a> </p> </div> - )} - {!isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError && ( + ) : ( <div className="min-h-[48px] h-fit w-full dark:bg-warning-background/10 bg-warning-background/35 px-3 py-2 rounded-xl flex items-start gap-2"> <InformationSquareIcon className="dark:text-warning-text text-warning-foreground w-[36px] h-[36px] md:w-[24px] md:h-[24px]" /> <p className="text-xs font-light dark:text-warning-text text-warning-foreground leading-tight"> Make sure the recipient's account number is accurate before proceeding with swap. <a href="#" className="text-lavender-500 text-semibold">Learn more.</a> </p> </div> - )} - </AnimatedFeedbackItem> + )} + </AnimatedFeedbackItem> + )}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx(9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (3)
app/components/AnimatedComponents.tsx (1)
AnimatedFeedbackItem(275-288)app/utils.ts (1)
classNames(22-24)app/components/InputError.tsx (1)
InputError(5-20)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (9)
5-5: LGTM!Import addition is appropriate for the new warning alerts below.
61-61: LGTM!State declaration is appropriate for managing the editable/non-editable recipient name flow.
128-128: LGTM!Correctly resets editable state when selecting a saved recipient, ensuring the verified name is displayed read-only.
243-243: LGTM!Appropriately resets editable state when institution changes during manual entry flow.
284-284: LGTM!Correctly disables editable mode when verification encounters an error.
332-332: LGTM!Properly resets editable state when clearing recipient details.
271-280: LGTM!The verification logic correctly handles the "Ok" response for manual entry fallback. Based on learnings, Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from verification, so this check is sufficient without additional institution type checks.
434-459: LGTM!The editable input implementation correctly renders when manual entry is required, includes appropriate validation rules, and displays errors properly.
499-507: Fix text accuracy and styling issues.Multiple small issues with the alert text and styling:
- Line 507: Missing "your" before "swap" — requirements specify "your swap"
- Lines 499, 507: Missing period before "Learn more"
- Lines 499, 507:
text-semiboldshould befont-semibold(correct Tailwind class)Apply this diff:
- Unable to verify details. Ensure the recipient's account number is accurate before proceeding with swap. <a href="#" className="text-lavender-500 text-semibold">Learn more.</a> + Unable to verify details. Ensure the recipient's account number is accurate before proceeding with your swap. <a href="#" className="text-lavender-500 font-semibold">Learn more.</a>- Make sure the recipient's account number is accurate before proceeding with swap. <a href="#" className="text-lavender-500 text-semibold">Learn more.</a> + Make sure the recipient's account number is accurate before proceeding with your swap. <a href="#" className="text-lavender-500 font-semibold">Learn more.</a>⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231 File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280 Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
…recipient name to include form validation errors
…rification feedback and track alert visibility
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx(13 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:494-511
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:25:06.205Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), the recipient safety alert should only display when all of the following conditions are met: recipientName is present, !recipientNameError (no API error), !errors.recipientName (no form validation errors), and !isFetchingRecipientName. This ensures validation errors take precedence over the alert as per PR #231 requirements.
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:25:06.205Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:494-511
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:25:06.205Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), the recipient safety alert should only display when all of the following conditions are met: recipientName is present, !recipientNameError (no API error), !errors.recipientName (no form validation errors), and !isFetchingRecipientName. This ensures validation errors take precedence over the alert as per PR #231 requirements.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (3)
app/components/AnimatedComponents.tsx (1)
AnimatedFeedbackItem(275-288)app/utils.ts (1)
classNames(22-24)app/components/InputError.tsx (1)
InputError(5-20)
…ipient name and error state
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx(13 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.019Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is true (verification failed/returned "Ok"), the recipient safety alert should display when: isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !errors.recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !isFetchingRecipientName check is redundant because recipientName is cleared at fetch start and only populated after fetching completes or when the user manually enters it.
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.019Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is false (verification succeeded), the recipient safety alert should display when: !isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !errors.recipientName check is unnecessary because in non-editable mode the recipient name is displayed as read-only text (not an input field), so form validation errors cannot occur.
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.019Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.019Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is true (verification failed/returned "Ok"), the recipient safety alert should display when: isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !errors.recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !isFetchingRecipientName check is redundant because recipientName is cleared at fetch start and only populated after fetching completes or when the user manually enters it.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.019Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.019Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is false (verification succeeded), the recipient safety alert should display when: !isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !errors.recipientName check is unnecessary because in non-editable mode the recipient name is displayed as read-only text (not an input field), so form validation errors cannot occur.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.567Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (3)
app/components/AnimatedComponents.tsx (1)
AnimatedFeedbackItem(275-288)app/utils.ts (1)
classNames(22-24)app/components/InputError.tsx (1)
InputError(5-20)
* feat: complete glitchtip integration with sentry wizard * fix: add glitchtip url to env * fix: resolve CodeRabbit review – harden PII handling, env example & beforeSend parsing * fix: harden beforeSend fallback * fix: add base64url-safe JWT decoding in beforeSend for reliable Privy session extraction * fix: update glitchtip public-url * fix: add release to withSentryConfig * refactor: migrate from GlitchTip to Sentry for error tracking - Updated environment variables in .env.example to reflect Sentry configuration. - Refactored Sentry initialization in instrumentation-client.ts, sentry.edge.config.ts, and sentry.server.config.ts to use Sentry DSN and environment variables. - Adjusted config types and values in app/lib/config.ts to support Sentry integration. - Updated package dependencies to use the latest version of @sentry/nextjs and related packages. - Ensured proper handling of PII and traces sample rate based on the environment.
* feat: enhance user tracking with server-side event logging - Added server-side user identification and event tracking in various components including Navbar, TransactionPreview, and TransactionStatus. - Implemented `identifyServerUser` and `trackServerEvent` functions to log user actions such as login, logout, funding, and transaction events. - Updated `trackUserEvent` helper function to streamline user identification and event tracking. - Ensured backward compatibility with existing client-side tracking methods. * feat: enhance analytics tracking with IP and User-Agent logging - Updated the analytics identify and track routes to include IP address and User-Agent in tracking requests. - Refactored event tracking functions to utilize common properties for improved consistency and clarity. - Ensured that sensitive data is sanitized before being sent to analytics services for geo-inference and device detection. * refactor: streamline server event tracking and IP inclusion logic - Removed redundant trackServerEvent call in analytics tracking. - Updated trackServerEvent invocation to standardize the event name format. - Enhanced IP address inclusion logic to respect privacy settings, ensuring compliance with user privacy preferences. * refactor: remove trackUserEvent function * refactor: improve wallet address handling and event tracking logic - Updated wallet address retrieval to use undefined instead of null for better type handling. - Streamlined event tracking by ensuring wallet address is only included when present, allowing for generic event tracking when absent. - Enhanced the handling of transaction, funding, and authentication events to ensure they are tracked appropriately based on wallet address availability. - Removed redundant server-side tracking calls in favor of a more consistent client-side approach. * refactor: remove wallet address retrieval for server-side tracking * refactor: standardize properties handling in event tracking functions - Updated event tracking functions to use default empty object for properties parameter, improving consistency and reducing the need for undefined checks. - This change applies to multiple tracking functions including trackPageView, trackBlogCardClick, and trackSearch. * Update app/hooks/analytics/useMixpanel.ts Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Chibuotu Amadi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Removed unused import of config and replaced it with environment variables for Sentry URL and auth token. - Standardized formatting in serverExternalPackages and webpack configuration for consistency. - Ensured proper structure in the rules section of the webpack configuration. - Minor adjustments to maintain code clarity and organization.
…fig.mjs - Introduced a new configuration option to disable source map uploads in low-memory environments. - Added a script in package.json for building in low-memory mode, setting appropriate Node options.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (1)
87-107: Consider extracting RecipientAlert for reusability.The component is well-implemented and correctly handles analytics. Defining it inside the parent function means it's recreated on every render, though React handles this efficiently.
If you prefer, you could extract it outside and pass
currencyandselectedInstitution?.nameas props, but the current approach is acceptable given the tight coupling with parent state.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx(13 hunks)app/pages/TransactionForm.tsx(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/pages/TransactionForm.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is true (verification failed/returned "Ok"), the recipient safety alert should display when: isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !errors.recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !isFetchingRecipientName check is redundant because recipientName is cleared at fetch start and only populated after fetching completes or when the user manually enters it.
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is false (verification succeeded), the recipient safety alert should display when: !isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !errors.recipientName check is unnecessary because in non-editable mode the recipient name is displayed as read-only text (not an input field), so form validation errors cannot occur.
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.593Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is true (verification failed/returned "Ok"), the recipient safety alert should display when: isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !errors.recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !isFetchingRecipientName check is redundant because recipientName is cleared at fetch start and only populated after fetching completes or when the user manually enters it.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is false (verification succeeded), the recipient safety alert should display when: !isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !errors.recipientName check is unnecessary because in non-editable mode the recipient name is displayed as read-only text (not an input field), so form validation errors cannot occur.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.593Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.593Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (3)
app/components/AnimatedComponents.tsx (1)
AnimatedFeedbackItem(275-288)app/utils.ts (1)
classNames(23-25)app/components/InputError.tsx (1)
InputError(5-20)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: build (20.x)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (6)
5-5: LGTM!The new imports (
InformationSquareIconandtrackEvent) are correctly used for rendering the alert UI and tracking analytics events.Also applies to: 14-14
62-62: LGTM!The new state variables correctly manage the editable name flow and per-instance analytics tracking.
Also applies to: 73-73
216-235: LGTM!The analytics tracking correctly matches the actual alert visibility conditions per the learnings. The
shouldShowAlertlogic properly handles both editable and non-editable cases, and the dependency array is complete.Based on learnings.
318-331: LGTM!The verification logic correctly handles the "Ok" response by enabling manual entry mode. Per the learnings, Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok", so this check appropriately covers both verification failures and Mobile Money without needing explicit institution type checks.
Based on learnings.
481-506: LGTM!The editable recipient name input is correctly implemented with appropriate validation (required, minimum 2 characters) and error handling. The integration with react-hook-form and conditional styling work well.
541-554: LGTM!The alert rendering conditions correctly match the learnings:
- Editable case (line 542): Checks all four conditions including form validation errors
- Non-editable case (line 548): Omits
errors.recipientNamecheck since the name is read-onlyThe conditions ensure alerts display only when appropriate, with validation errors taking precedence.
Based on learnings.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (1)
90-127: Update anchor href to use the actual URL for better accessibility.The "Learn more" link has a real URL defined at line 108 and opens it via JavaScript, but the
hrefattribute still uses"#"as a placeholder. This creates accessibility and UX issues:
- Screen readers won't announce the correct destination
- Users can't right-click to copy/open the link
- Keyboard navigation shows "#" in the status bar
- Link won't work if JavaScript is disabled
🔎 Suggested improvement
Update the anchor tag to use the actual URL and add security attributes:
<a - href="#" + href="https://noblocks.xyz/blog/understanding-account-name-verification-on-noblocks" + target="_blank" + rel="noopener noreferrer" onClick={handleLearnMoreClick} className="font-semibold text-lavender-500" > Learn more. </a>Then update the click handler to prevent default navigation since you're tracking analytics:
const handleLearnMoreClick = (e: React.MouseEvent) => { - e.preventDefault(); trackEvent("recipient_alert_learn_more_clicked", { alert_type: isEditable ? "verification_failed" : "verification_success", message: message.substring(0, 100), currency: currency, institution: selectedInstitution?.name || "", }); - // Open relevant help article in new tab - const helpUrl = - "https://noblocks.xyz/blog/understanding-account-name-verification-on-noblocks"; - window.open(helpUrl, "_blank"); };This approach:
- Maintains the analytics tracking
- Provides proper accessibility
- Works without JavaScript
- Follows security best practices with
rel="noopener noreferrer"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx(12 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is true (verification failed/returned "Ok"), the recipient safety alert should display when: isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !errors.recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !isFetchingRecipientName check is redundant because recipientName is cleared at fetch start and only populated after fetching completes or when the user manually enters it.
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is false (verification succeeded), the recipient safety alert should display when: !isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !errors.recipientName check is unnecessary because in non-editable mode the recipient name is displayed as read-only text (not an input field), so form validation errors cannot occur.
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.593Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is true (verification failed/returned "Ok"), the recipient safety alert should display when: isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !errors.recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !isFetchingRecipientName check is redundant because recipientName is cleared at fetch start and only populated after fetching completes or when the user manually enters it.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:539-552
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:37:39.036Z
Learning: In RecipientDetailsForm (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), when isRecipientNameEditable is false (verification succeeded), the recipient safety alert should display when: !isRecipientNameEditable && recipientName && !recipientNameError. The !errors.recipientName check is unnecessary because in non-editable mode the recipient name is displayed as read-only text (not an input field), so form validation errors cannot occur.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
📚 Learning: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.593Z
Learnt from: Dprof-in-tech
Repo: paycrest/noblocks PR: 231
File: app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx:271-280
Timestamp: 2025-11-06T07:08:54.593Z
Learning: In the RecipientDetailsForm component (app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx), Mobile Money institutions always return "Ok" from the fetchAccountName verification endpoint. Therefore, checking for accountName.toLowerCase() === "ok" is sufficient to handle both verification failures and Mobile Money institutions without needing explicit institution type checks in the frontend.
Applied to files:
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (3)
app/components/AnimatedComponents.tsx (1)
AnimatedFeedbackItem(275-288)app/utils.ts (1)
classNames(23-25)app/components/InputError.tsx (1)
InputError(5-20)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: build (20.x)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/components/recipient/RecipientDetailsForm.tsx (6)
5-9: LGTM!The new imports for
InformationSquareIconandtrackEventare properly integrated and used throughout the component.Also applies to: 18-18
236-268: LGTM!The analytics tracking logic correctly aligns with alert visibility conditions and includes all necessary dependencies. The implementation properly handles both editable and non-editable cases per the established requirements.
Based on learnings.
352-366: LGTM!The verification logic correctly handles the "Ok" response by enabling manual name entry. The implementation aligns with the backend behavior where Mobile Money institutions and failed verifications return "Ok", making explicit institution type checks unnecessary.
Based on learnings.
514-544: LGTM!The editable recipient name input is properly implemented with appropriate validation rules, error handling, and styling. The form integration follows React Hook Form best practices.
578-594: LGTM!The conditional alert rendering correctly implements the visibility logic per the established requirements. The conditions properly distinguish between editable (verification failed) and non-editable (verification succeeded) cases, ensuring alerts display only when appropriate.
Based on learnings.
174-174: LGTM!The
isRecipientNameEditablestate is properly reset in all relevant flows (selecting saved recipient, changing institution, clearing details), ensuring correct behavior throughout the component lifecycle.Also applies to: 323-323, 412-412
5ran6
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
06dafbf to
5b287b7
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This pull request enhances the recipient details form to better handle cases where recipient account verification fails, allowing users to manually enter the recipient name and providing clearer feedback. The main changes include introducing an editable recipient name input, updating error handling, and displaying a warning message when verification is unsuccessful.
Recipient Name Verification & Manual Entry
isRecipientNameEditableto control whether the recipient name field is editable by the user."Ok"(indicating verification failure but not an error), the form now enables manual entry of the recipient name and clears any previous value or error.User Interface & Feedback
Icon Usage
InformationSquareIconfor the warning message to visually highlight verification issues.References
closes #229
closes #275
Testing
Checklist
mainBy submitting a PR, I agree to Paycrest's Contributor Code of Conduct and Contribution Guide.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.