Skip to content

openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs: Also evaluate "exclude_name_regex" #394

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

okurz
Copy link
Member

@okurz okurz commented Apr 28, 2025

It was observed that openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs were triggered even
though according openqa-investigate jobs were not as the variable
"exclude_name_regex" would exclude the job. However unlike
"exclude_group_regex" the variable "exclude_name_regex" so far
was only evaluated within openqa-investigate, not
openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs. This commit adds according handling within
openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs with according unit test.

@asdil12

This comment was marked as resolved.

@okurz okurz force-pushed the feature/bisect_name_regex branch 3 times, most recently from 223319a to b0f9480 Compare April 29, 2025 07:33
@okurz
Copy link
Member Author

okurz commented Apr 29, 2025

Could you maybe use this opportunity to add a help text to openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs describing what it does and when that is useful?

Sorry, I removed unrelated changes. This PR should be only about introducing exclude_name_regex

okurz added 2 commits April 29, 2025 09:37
It was observed that openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs were triggered even
though according openqa-investigate jobs were not as the variable
"exclude_name_regex" would exclude the job. However unlike
"exclude_group_regex" the variable "exclude_name_regex"  so far
was only evaluated within openqa-investigate, not
openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs. This commit adds according handling within
openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs with according unit test.
@okurz
Copy link
Member Author

okurz commented Apr 29, 2025

Could you maybe use this opportunity to add a help text to openqa-trigger-bisect-jobs describing what it does and when that is useful?

Done in

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 6480948 into os-autoinst:master Apr 29, 2025
4 checks passed
@okurz okurz deleted the feature/bisect_name_regex branch May 12, 2025 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants