feat: generatecode support import element style #817
Conversation
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.jsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error: Cannot read config file: /packages/vue-generator/.eslintrc.cjs
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces enhancements to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
enhancement
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js (2)
8-17: Consider enhancing default options for better flexibility and documentation.The default options are good, but consider the following improvements:
- Add JSDoc comments to explain the purpose of each option.
- Consider making the
fileNamemore specific, e.g.,packageJsonFileName.- The
pathoption might benefit from a more descriptive name, such asprojectRootPath.Here's a suggested improvement:
/** * @typedef {Object} PluginOptions * @property {string} packageJsonFileName - Name of the package.json file (default: 'package.json') * @property {string} projectRootPath - Root path of the project (default: '.') * @property {Object} prettierOption - Prettier configuration options */ /** @type {PluginOptions} */ const defaultOptions = { packageJsonFileName: 'package.json', projectRootPath: '.', prettierOption: { singleQuote: true, printWidth: 120, semi: false, trailingComma: 'none' } }
19-23: Consider adding type checking for options.While the function uses default options, it might be beneficial to add type checking for the passed options to ensure they meet the expected structure.
Consider using TypeScript or adding runtime type checks:
function genElementPlusStyleDeps(options = {}) { if (typeof options !== 'object' || options === null) { throw new TypeError('Options must be an object'); } // ... rest of the function }packages/vue-generator/src/generator/generateApp.js (3)
67-67: LGTM: New globalState plugin added correctly.The
globalStateplugin has been correctly added to themergeWithDefaultPluginobject, following the pattern of other plugins.For consistency with other plugins, consider moving the
globalStatedeclaration earlier in the object, perhaps after thedependenciesplugin. This would maintain alphabetical order:const mergeWithDefaultPlugin = { template: template || defaultPlugins.template, block: block || defaultPlugins.block, page: page || defaultPlugins.page, dataSource: dataSource || defaultPlugins.dataSource, dependencies: dependencies || defaultPlugins.dependencies, + globalState: globalState || defaultPlugins.globalState, i18n: i18n || defaultPlugins.i18n, router: router || defaultPlugins.router, utils: utils || defaultPlugins.utils, - globalState: globalState || defaultPlugins.globalState }
67-70: LGTM: Element Plus style injection support added.The new conditional block correctly implements the optional injection of Element Plus styles. It provides flexibility by allowing users to explicitly disable the injection or customize it through the
injectElementPlusStyleproperty.For improved clarity, consider using a more explicit condition and adding a comment explaining the default behavior:
- // 默认支持 element-plus 注入样式 - if (config?.customContext?.injectElementPlusStyle !== false) { - transformEnd.push(appendElePlusStylePlugin(config?.customContext?.injectElementPlusStyle || {})) + // Inject Element Plus styles by default unless explicitly disabled + const injectStyles = config?.customContext?.injectElementPlusStyle + if (injectStyles !== false) { + transformEnd.push(appendElePlusStylePlugin(injectStyles || {})) }This change makes it clearer that the styles are injected by default and that the
injectElementPlusStyleproperty can be used for customization.
Hardcoded Element Plus Style Import Detected
The
appendElePlusStylePlugin.jsfile contains a hardcoded import of'element-plus/dist/index.css', which prevents the injection of Element Plus styles from being configurable as intended.
- File:
packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js- Issue: Hardcoded import statement:
import 'element-plus/dist/index.css'Recommendation:
Modify theappendElePlusStylePlugin.jsto allow conditional or configurable injection of Element Plus styles based on the provided configuration, ensuring flexibility and adherence to the intended design.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-85: Summary: New features added successfully.This PR successfully implements two new features:
- Support for injecting Element Plus styles, which can be configured or disabled through the
injectElementPlusStyleproperty.- Addition of a new
globalStateplugin to the code generation process.These changes enhance the flexibility and functionality of the code generator without introducing breaking changes. The implementation follows existing patterns in the codebase and allows for easy configuration.
To ensure that these changes don't have unintended side effects, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any potential issues related to the new imports and plugins across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new imports and plugins # Test 1: Check for any hardcoded references to Element Plus styles echo "Checking for hardcoded Element Plus style references:" rg --type js "element-plus/.*\.css" # Test 2: Verify the usage of globalState plugin echo "Checking usage of globalState plugin:" rg --type js "genGlobalState|globalState.*plugin" # Test 3: Look for any potential naming conflicts with the new imports echo "Checking for potential naming conflicts:" rg --type js "appendElePlusStylePlugin|genGlobalState"Length of output: 1579
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- packages/vue-generator/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/src/generator/generateApp.js (2 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/index.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (4)
packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/index.js (1)
12-12: LGTM! New plugin export added successfully.The addition of
appendElePlusStylePluginaligns well with the PR objective of adding support for importing element styles. The naming convention is consistent with other plugins, and the change doesn't affect existing functionality.To ensure the new plugin is properly implemented, please run the following verification script:
This script will verify the existence of the new plugin file and check its basic structure.
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! New plugin export added successfully.
The addition of
appendElePlusStylePluginaligns with the PR objective of adding support for importing element styles. The naming convention is consistent with other plugins, and the plugin correctly exports the default functiongenElementPlusStyleDeps. Existing functionality remains unaffected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and basic structure of the new plugin file # Check if the new plugin file exists if [ -f "./packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js" ]; then echo "Plugin file exists." # Check if the file exports a default function (common plugin structure) if grep -q "export default function" "./packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js"; then echo "Plugin file appears to have the correct structure." else echo "Warning: Plugin file may not have the expected structure. Please review manually." fi else echo "Error: Plugin file not found. Please ensure 'appendElePlusStylePlugin.js' exists in the correct location." fiLength of output: 400
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the exports of the new plugin file # Display the content of the plugin file echo "=== Content of appendElePlusStylePlugin.js ===" cat ./packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js # List all export statements in the plugin file echo "=== Export statements in appendElePlusStylePlugin.js ===" grep "^export" ./packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js # Check if the plugin exports a default class or object if grep -q "export default class" ./packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js; then echo "Plugin exports a default class." elif grep -q "export default {" ./packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js; then echo "Plugin exports a default object." else echo "Plugin does not export a default class or object." fiLength of output: 2758
packages/vue-generator/package.json (1)
56-56: Verify the necessity and consistency of the new peer dependency.The addition of
@babel/generatoras a peer dependency seems consistent with the existing peer dependencies (@babel/parserand@babel/traverse). However, please consider the following points:
Ensure that
@babel/generatoris actually used in the project code. If it's not directly used, it might be unnecessary to add it as a peer dependency.The version
^7.18.13is consistent with the other Babel-related peer dependencies. However, it's worth noting that this is not the latest version. Consider if there's a specific reason for using this version or if it should be updated to the latest compatible version.Adding this as a peer dependency implies that the consuming project should provide this dependency. Verify if this is the intended behavior or if it should be a direct dependency instead.
Check if any changes in the project's build process or documentation are needed to reflect this new requirement.
To help verify the usage and necessity of
@babel/generator, you can run the following script:This script will help identify if and where
@babel/generatoris being used in the project, which can inform the decision to keep it as a peer dependency.✅ Verification successful
Confirmation:
@babel/generatoris correctly added as a peer dependency.The import of
@babel/generatorinsrc/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.jsverifies its usage within the project. The specified version^7.18.13is consistent with other Babel-related dependencies, ensuring compatibility and stability.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of @babel/generator in the project # Search for import or require statements of @babel/generator echo "Searching for imports of @babel/generator:" rg --type js --type ts 'import.*from.*@babel/generator|require\(.*@babel/generator\)' ./packages/vue-generator # Search for any mention of generate in relation to Babel, which might indicate usage of @babel/generator echo "Searching for potential usage of Babel generate functionality:" rg --type js --type ts 'babel.*generate|generate.*babel' ./packages/vue-generatorLength of output: 636
packages/vue-generator/src/plugins/appendElePlusStylePlugin.js (1)
1-6: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and necessary.The imported libraries and functions are well-chosen for parsing, traversing, and generating JavaScript code, as well as for formatting the output.
packages/vue-generator/src/generator/generateApp.js (1)
12-13: LGTM: New imports added correctly.The new imports for
genGlobalStateandappendElePlusStylePluginhave been added correctly, following the existing naming conventions in the file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/README.md (2)
1-3: Consider adding an English translation for better accessibility.The title and introduction provide clear context about the project. However, to improve accessibility for a wider audience, consider adding an English translation alongside the Chinese text.
Here's a suggested addition:
## portal-app + +This project is generated using the TinyEngine low-code engine. 本工程是使用 TinyEngine 低代码引擎搭建之后得到的出码工程。
5-17: Clear instructions provided. Consider adding English translations.The usage instructions are well-structured and easy to follow. The use of code blocks for commands is particularly helpful. To improve accessibility, consider adding English translations for the instructions.
Here's a suggested addition:
## 使用 +## Usage 安装依赖： +Install dependencies: ```bash npm install本地启动项目：
+Start the project locally:npm run dev</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/i18n/index.js (2)</summary><blockquote> `5-5`: **LGTM, but consider adding documentation.** The configuration of `i18n.lowcode = lowcode` looks correct. However, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining the purpose and content of the `lowcode` object, and how it affects the i18n configuration. This would improve code maintainability and understanding for other developers. Consider adding a comment like this: ```javascript // Configure i18n with lowcode-specific settings i18n.lowcode = lowcode
1-7: Overall assessment: Good implementation with minor improvements needed.This file sets up the i18n configuration for the application, which is a good practice for internationalization. However, there are a few points to address:
- Remove the unused
localeimport or ensure it's being used as intended.- Add documentation to explain the purpose of the
lowcodeconfiguration.While these changes contribute to the overall structure of the application, they don't directly address the PR objective of importing styles from 'element-plus'. Ensure that this functionality is implemented in the appropriate files, such as
main.js, as mentioned in the PR description.packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/App.vue (1)
1-11: Overall assessment: Well-structured Vue 3 component with proper i18n setup.This
App.vuefile demonstrates a clean and efficient implementation of a root component for a Vue 3 application. It correctly uses the<router-view>for rendering route-matched components and sets up i18n for internationalization support. The use of the<script setup>syntax and theprovidefunction for i18n injection aligns with modern Vue 3 best practices.Consider the following architectural advice:
- Ensure that the i18n setup is consistent across the application.
- If the application grows, consider lazy-loading translations to improve initial load time.
- Document the i18n usage pattern for other developers working on the project.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/store.js (1)
13-13: Export statement looks good, consider default export.The named export of
useStoresis correct and follows common JavaScript module patterns.If
useStoresis intended to be the main (or only) export of this file, you might consider using a default export instead:-export { useStores } +export default useStoresThis change would simplify imports in other files, allowing them to use:
import useStores from './path/to/store'instead of:
import { useStores } from './path/to/store'The choice between named and default exports depends on your project's conventions and how you intend to use this module.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/router/index.js (2)
2-5: LGTM: Route definitions are well-structured.The routes are defined correctly, with a root redirect and lazy loading for the DemoPage component. This approach is good for performance and follows Vue Router best practices.
For consistency, consider using object shorthand notation for the
routesarray:const routes = [ { path: '/', redirect: '/demopage' }, - { path: '/demopage', component: () => import('@/views/DemoPage.vue') } + { path: '/demopage', component: () => import('@/views/DemoPage.vue') }, ]Adding a trailing comma makes it easier to add or reorder routes in the future and maintains consistency with multi-line array/object declarations.
7-10: LGTM: Router creation and export are correct.The router is created and exported correctly using Vue Router 4.x syntax. The use of
createWebHashHistory()for the history mode is a valid choice.Note that using hash mode (
createWebHashHistory) is good for compatibility with servers that don't support URL rewriting. However, if your production environment supports URL rewriting, you might consider using HTML5 history mode (createWebHistory) for cleaner URLs. This decision depends on your deployment requirements and can be easily changed later if needed.packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/index.html (1)
3-8: LGTM: Well-structured head section with a note on the title.The head section is well-structured with proper meta tags for character encoding and viewport, and includes a favicon link. These are all good practices for web development.
Consider reviewing the title "portal-app" to ensure it accurately represents your application or replace it with a more descriptive title if needed.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/vite.config.js (2)
13-15: Consider limiting exposed environment variables.The current configuration makes all environment variables available in the application, which is functional but might pose a security risk if sensitive information is inadvertently exposed.
Consider explicitly listing only the required environment variables instead of exposing all of them. For example:
define: { 'process.env': { NODE_ENV: process.env.NODE_ENV, // Add other necessary variables here } }This approach ensures that only the required variables are exposed to the client-side code.
16-22: Consider enabling CSS code splitting for larger applications.The build configuration is generally well-optimized with minification enabled and support for mixed ES modules. However, disabling CSS code splitting (
cssCodeSplit: false) might increase the initial load time for larger applications.For smaller applications, the current configuration is fine. However, if this project is expected to grow or already has a significant amount of CSS, consider enabling CSS code splitting to improve initial load times:
build: { minify: true, commonjsOptions: { transformMixedEsModules: true }, // Remove or set to true // cssCodeSplit: true }This allows for more efficient loading of CSS, especially in larger applications with multiple routes.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/config.js (1)
13-15: LGTM: Default HTTP configuration objectThe exported configuration object with
withCredentials: falseis a good default setting for HTTP requests. This prevents credentials from being sent in cross-origin requests by default, which is generally safer.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this configuration, especially if other team members might not be familiar with the
withCredentialsoption. For example:export default { + // Determines whether cross-site Access-Control requests should include credentials withCredentials: false }packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue (1)
25-25: Add styles or remove empty style sectionThe
<style>section is currently empty but includes thescopedattribute.If component-specific styles are needed, add them to this section. Otherwise, consider removing the empty
<style>tag to keep the component file concise:- <style scoped></style>If you decide to keep it for future use, consider adding a comment explaining its intended purpose:
<style scoped> /* Component-specific styles will be added here in the future */ </style>packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/index.js (1)
1-27: Summary of review: Good foundation, but needs some improvementsOverall, this module provides a good foundation for a configurable HTTP client. However, there are a few key areas that need attention:
- Clarify the purpose and content of the local './axios' import.
- Implement the TODO item for handling 403 errors, including re-login logic.
- Expand error handling to cover more HTTP status codes and error scenarios.
- Consider adding input validation or type checking for the
dataHandlerparameter.Addressing these points will significantly improve the robustness and maintainability of this module.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/element-plus-case.test.js (3)
9-14: LGTM: Clear test description and setup. Consider adding English translation.The test description and setup are well-structured and clearly state the purpose of the test. The use of a predefined schema (appSchemaDemo01) demonstrates a standardized approach to testing.
Consider adding an English translation for the Chinese comment to improve accessibility for non-Chinese speaking developers:
- test('should generate element-plus css import statement 预期生成 element-plus 样式依赖引入', async () => { + test('should generate element-plus css import statement (预期生成 element-plus 样式依赖引入)', async () => {
16-40: LGTM: Thorough file generation and comparison logic. Consider parameterizing paths.The file generation and comparison logic is well-implemented. Converting line endings to CRLF ensures consistency, and the comparison options are appropriately set to ignore non-essential differences.
Consider parameterizing the result and expected paths to improve maintainability:
+ const RESULT_DIR = './result/appdemo01' + const EXPECTED_DIR = './expected/appdemo01' - fs.mkdirSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}`), { recursive: true }) + fs.mkdirSync(path.resolve(__dirname, `${RESULT_DIR}/${filePath}`), { recursive: true }) - path.resolve(__dirname, `./result/appdemo01/${filePath}/${fileName}`), + path.resolve(__dirname, `${RESULT_DIR}/${filePath}/${fileName}`), - const path1 = path.resolve(__dirname, './expected/appdemo01') - const path2 = path.resolve(__dirname, './result/appdemo01') + const path1 = path.resolve(__dirname, EXPECTED_DIR) + const path2 = path.resolve(__dirname, RESULT_DIR)This change would make it easier to update paths in the future if needed.
39-43: LGTM: Clear assertion. Consider adding specific checks.The test conclusion is straightforward, asserting that the generated files match the expected files. The use of a custom logging function (logDiffResult) is good for error reporting.
Consider adding more specific assertions to check particular aspects of the generated files, especially the Element Plus CSS import statement. This would make the test more robust and easier to debug. For example:
const mainJsPath = path.resolve(__dirname, `${RESULT_DIR}/src/main.js`); const mainJsContent = fs.readFileSync(mainJsPath, 'utf8'); expect(mainJsContent).toContain("import 'element-plus/dist/index.css'");This additional check would explicitly verify the presence of the Element Plus CSS import statement, which is the main focus of this test according to its description.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/mockData.js (2)
64-72: LGTM: Well-defined componentsMap with minor suggestionThe
componentsMaparray is well-structured and contains the necessary information for the ElInput component from element-plus. The use of the caret (^) in the version specification allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
componentsMaparray, especially in the context of this mock data file. This would enhance the readability and maintainability of the test case. For example:// componentsMap: Defines the external components used in the application // and their import details for code generation componentsMap: [ // ... existing code ]
73-86: Suggestions for improving the meta objectThe
metaobject provides comprehensive application-level information, which is great for testing various scenarios. However, there are a few points that could be improved:
- The
is_demofield is set tonull, which is inconsistent with other boolean values in the object. Consider using a boolean value for consistency.- The
creatorfield is empty. For more realistic mock data, consider providing a placeholder value.- The
git_groupandproject_namefields are empty. If these are optional, consider adding a comment to indicate this.Here's a suggested improvement:
meta: { // ... other fields remain the same is_demo: false, // or true, depending on the intended use global_state: [], appId: '918', creator: 'mock_creator', // Add a placeholder value // Optional fields git_group: '', // Optional: Git group for the project project_name: '', // Optional: Name of the project repository // ... remaining fields }This change makes the mock data more consistent and potentially more useful for testing edge cases.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/lowcode.js (2)
28-28: Avoid naming conflicts by renaming the parameterThe function
refhas a parameter also namedrefin line 28. This can cause confusion and reduce code readability.Consider renaming the parameter to clarify its purpose:
- const ref = (ref) => instance.refs[ref] + const ref = (refName) => instance.refs[refName]
80-81: Reassess the necessity of re-providingI18nInjectionKeyYou inject
i18non line 80 and immediately provide it again on line 81 without modification. If there's no specific reason to re-provide it, this step might be redundant.Consider removing the unnecessary
providecall:- provide(I18nInjectionKey, i18n)packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/dataSource.js (1)
18-18: Standardize comments to English for consistencyThe comments on lines 18 and 31 are in Chinese. To maintain consistency and readability across the codebase, especially for international teams, it's advisable to use English for all comments.
Please consider translating the comments:
-// 暂时使用 eval 解析 JSON 数据里的函数 +// Temporarily using eval to parse functions from JSON data-// 如果没有配置远程请求，则直接返回静态数据，返回前可能会有全局数据处理 +// If no remote request is configured, return static data directly; there may be global data handling before returningAlso applies to: 31-31
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/element-plus-case.test.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/README.md (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/index.html (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/App.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/axios.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/config.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/i18n/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/i18n/locale.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/bridge.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/dataSource.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/dataSource.json (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/lowcode.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/store.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/main.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/router/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/utils.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/vite.config.js (1 hunks)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/mockData.js (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/.gitignore
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/i18n/locale.js
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/bridge.js
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/dataSource.json
- packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/utils.js
🧰 Additional context used
Biome
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/axios.js
[error] 32-32: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 130-130: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/dataSource.js
[error] 22-22: eval() exposes to security risks and performance issues.
See the MDN web docs for more details.
Refactor the code so that it doesn't need to call eval().(lint/security/noGlobalEval)
Gitleaks
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/mockData.js
55-55: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments not posted (35)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/README.md (1)
19-19: Proper file ending.The file correctly ends with a single newline, which is a good practice. This ensures compatibility with various tools and makes diffs cleaner.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/i18n/index.js (1)
7-7: LGTM!The default export of the configured
i18nobject is correct and allows for easy import and use in other parts of the application.packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/App.vue (2)
1-3: LGTM: Template section is correctly implemented.The template section uses the
<router-view>component, which is the correct approach for rendering route-matched components in a Vue application using vue-router.
5-11: LGTM: Script section is well-implemented. Verify i18n module.The script section correctly uses the
<script setup>syntax and properly sets up i18n for the application. Theprovidefunction is used correctly to make the i18n instance available to descendant components.Please verify the existence and correct implementation of the local
i18nmodule:packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/store.js (3)
1-13: Overall assessment: Good addition with room for improvementThis new
store.jsfile introduces a useful utility functionuseStoresfor centralizing store management. The implementation is generally sound and achieves its purpose. However, there are several areas where it could be improved:
- Consider using specific imports instead of wildcard imports for better performance and maintainability.
- Enhance the robustness of the
useStoresfunction by adding type checks and error handling.- Evaluate the export strategy (named vs default) based on your project's conventions.
Implementing these suggestions will result in a more robust, maintainable, and efficient store management solution. Great work on introducing this feature!
3-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance robustness and simplify the useStores function.
The current implementation makes several assumptions that could lead to potential issues:
- It assumes each store has a
$idproperty and is a function.- The use of
Object.values({ ...useDefinedStores })might be unnecessary ifuseDefinedStoresis already an object.- There's no error handling for potential issues during store initialization.
Consider the following improvements:
const useStores = () => { const stores = {} - Object.values({ ...useDefinedStores }).forEach((store) => { - stores[store.$id] = store() + Object.entries(useDefinedStores).forEach(([key, store]) => { + if (typeof store === 'function') { + try { + const storeInstance = store() + stores[storeInstance.$id || key] = storeInstance + } catch (error) { + console.error(`Failed to initialize store ${key}:`, error) + } + } else { + console.warn(`Store ${key} is not a function and will be skipped.`) + } }) return stores }This refactored version:
- Uses
Object.entriesto get both keys and values, providing a fallback for the store name.- Checks if each store is a function before attempting to initialize it.
- Adds error handling to catch and log any initialization errors.
- Provides a warning for non-function stores.
To verify the structure of the imported stores, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the structure of imported stores # Test: Check the structure of files in the stores directory echo "Analyzing store files:" rg -A 5 'export (default |const )' src/stores
1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider using specific imports and verify path alias.
While using a wildcard import is convenient, it might lead to unnecessary imports if not all stores are used. Consider importing only the required stores explicitly for better performance and maintainability.
Also, ensure that the '@/' path alias is properly configured in your project setup, as it might not be recognized in all environments by default.
To verify the '@/' alias configuration and available stores, you can run:
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/router/index.js (2)
1-1: LGTM: Imports are correct and concise.The necessary functions
createRouterandcreateWebHashHistoryare imported from 'vue-router'. This is the correct approach for setting up a Vue router.
1-10: Verify the relevance of this file to the PR objectives.While this router configuration is correct and follows best practices, it doesn't directly relate to the PR's main objective of supporting import of element-plus styles.
Could you clarify how this router configuration fits into the larger context of the PR's goals? If it's part of a test suite or example application, it might be helpful to add a comment at the top of the file explaining its purpose in relation to the element-plus style import feature.
This script will help verify if there are any connections between the router configuration and the element-plus style imports that are the focus of this PR.
✅ Verification successful
The router/index.js file does not include any element-plus style imports, which aligns with the PR's main objective of supporting the import of element-plus styles elsewhere.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there are any references to element-plus styles in the router or related files. # Test 1: Check for element-plus style imports in the router file echo "Checking for element-plus style imports in router/index.js:" rg --type js "import.*element-plus.*css" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/router/index.js # Test 2: Check for element-plus style imports in the DemoPage component echo "Checking for element-plus style imports in DemoPage.vue:" rg --type vue "import.*element-plus.*css" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue # Test 3: Check for element-plus component usage in the DemoPage component echo "Checking for element-plus component usage in DemoPage.vue:" rg --type vue "<el-" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue # Test 4: Check for element-plus plugin usage in main.js echo "Checking for element-plus plugin usage in main.js:" rg --type js "use\(ElementPlus\)" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/main.jsLength of output: 1069
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify element-plus style imports and usage without relying on unsupported file types. # Test 1: Check for element-plus style imports in router/index.js echo "Checking for element-plus style imports in router/index.js:" rg "import.*element-plus.*css" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/router/index.js # Test 2: Check for element-plus style imports in DemoPage.vue echo "Checking for element-plus style imports in DemoPage.vue:" rg "import.*element-plus.*css" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue # Test 3: Check for element-plus component usage in DemoPage.vue echo "Checking for element-plus component usage in DemoPage.vue:" rg "<el-" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue # Test 4: Check for element-plus plugin usage in main.js echo "Checking for element-plus plugin usage in main.js:" rg "use\(ElementPlus\)" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/main.jsLength of output: 999
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/index.html (5)
1-1: LGTM: Correct HTML5 document type declaration.The HTML5 document type declaration is correctly specified.
2-2: LGTM: Proper language attribute specified.The HTML tag correctly includes the language attribute set to "en" for English, which is good for accessibility and SEO.
9-12: LGTM: Appropriate body structure for a Vue.js application.The body section is correctly structured with a minimal layout, containing only the necessary elements for a Vue.js application: a mounting point and a script tag for the main JavaScript file.
10-10: LGTM: Correct mounting point for Vue.js application.The div with id "app" is correctly placed and serves as the standard mounting point for a Vue.js application.
11-11: LGTM: Correct script tag for main JavaScript file, but verify the path.The script tag is correctly set up with
type="module"for a modern JavaScript application. The source file"/src/main.js"follows the common convention for a Vue.js application's main entry point.As this file is part of a test case, please verify that the path
/src/main.jsis correct for the test environment. Run the following script to check if the file exists in the expected location:If the file is not found, you may need to adjust the path or ensure that the file is created as part of the test setup.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The script path
/src/main.jsexists in the test environment and is correct.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of main.js in the test environment # Test: Check if main.js exists in the expected location fd -p 'packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/main.js'Length of output: 181
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/vite.config.js (3)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are correct and well-organized.The necessary modules are imported for the Vite configuration, including core Vite functionality, path manipulation, and Vue.js plugins. The import order is logical, starting with core modules followed by plugins.
7-11: LGTM: Resolve configuration is set up correctly.The alias configuration for '@' pointing to the 'src' directory is a good practice in Vue.js projects. It simplifies imports and makes the code more readable. The use of
path.resolve(__dirname, 'src')ensures that the path is correctly resolved regardless of the current working directory.
12-12: LGTM: Necessary plugins are included.The configuration correctly includes the Vue.js and Vue JSX plugins, which are essential for processing Vue single-file components and JSX in a Vite project.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/config.js (1)
1-11: LGTM: Comprehensive copyright and license headerThe copyright and license header is well-structured and includes all necessary information:
- Copyright notices for both TinyEngine Authors and Huawei Cloud Computing Technologies Co., Ltd.
- Reference to the MIT-style license
- Standard disclaimer for open-source software
This header follows best practices for open-source projects and provides clear attribution and licensing information.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/package.json (5)
1-3: LGTM: Project metadata is well-defined.The project name, version, and entry points are correctly specified for a Vue.js application.
Also applies to: 9-10
4-8: LGTM: Scripts are appropriate for a Vite-based Vue.js application.The defined scripts (dev, build, preview) provide the necessary commands for development, building, and previewing the application using Vite.
11-22: LGTM: Dependencies are comprehensive and align with PR objectives.The dependencies list includes all necessary libraries for a Vue.js application, including Vue Router, Pinia for state management, and Element Plus (version ^2.4.2) for UI components. This aligns well with the PR objective of adding support for importing styles from the
element-pluslibrary.
23-27: LGTM: DevDependencies are appropriate for Vue.js development with Vite.The devDependencies list includes Vite and the necessary plugins for Vue.js and JSX support, which are essential for developing a Vue.js application using Vite as the build tool.
1-28: Verify implementation of Element Plus style import.While the inclusion of Element Plus (version ^2.4.2) in the dependencies aligns with the PR objectives, the automatic import of styles (
import 'element-plus/dist/index.css') is not visible in thispackage.jsonfile. This implementation would typically be in a JavaScript file likemain.js.To ensure full alignment with the PR objectives, please run the following script to check for the presence of the style import in the
main.jsfile:If the import statement is not found, please ensure it's added to complete the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Element Plus style import verified.
The
main.jsfile correctly includes the statementimport 'element-plus/dist/index.css', ensuring that Element Plus styles are automatically imported as per the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Element Plus style import in main.js # Test: Search for the Element Plus style import in main.js rg --type js "import 'element-plus/dist/index.css'" packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/main.jsLength of output: 183
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/main.js (4)
1-11: LGTM: Copyright notice is present and complete.The copyright notice includes all necessary information and follows standard practices.
13-17: LGTM: Imports are complete and well-organized.All necessary modules for a Vue.js application are imported, including routing (vue-router) and state management (pinia). The addition of the Element Plus CSS import on line 17 successfully addresses the main objective of this PR.
18-19: LGTM: App initialization follows Vue.js best practices.The Vue app is properly initialized with Pinia for state management and the router. The order of operations is correct, and the app is mounted to the standard '#app' element.
1-19: Summary: File successfully implements PR objectives and follows best practices.This new
main.jsfile correctly sets up a Vue.js application with routing (vue-router) and state management (pinia). It successfully addresses the main PR objective by importing Element Plus styles (line 17). The file structure and content follow Vue.js best practices, and no issues or improvements are needed.packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/index.js (3)
1-11: LGTM: Copyright and license information is appropriate.The copyright notice and license information are well-formatted and provide necessary details about the ownership and usage terms of the code.
16-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueOverall structure looks good, but some improvements needed.
The function creates a configurable HTTP client with a response interceptor, which is a good practice. However, there are a few points to address:
- The TODO comment on line 22 indicates incomplete functionality for handling 403 errors. This should be implemented to ensure proper error handling and user experience.
Please implement the logic for handling 403 errors, including re-login and retrying the request as mentioned in the comment.
- The error handling only covers the 403 status code. It would be beneficial to handle other common error cases as well.
Consider adding more comprehensive error handling. Here's a suggested structure:
http.interceptors.response.use(dataHandler, (error) => { const response = error.response; if (response) { switch (response.status) { case 403: if (response.headers && response.headers['x-login-url']) { // TODO: Implement re-login and retry logic } break; case 404: // Handle not found errors break; case 500: // Handle server errors break; // Add more cases as needed } } return Promise.reject(error); });
- The
dataHandlerfunction is used directly in the interceptor, but its structure and expected behavior are not clear from this code.To ensure the
dataHandleris used correctly, could you provide more information about its expected structure and behavior? You might want to add some input validation or type checking for thedataHandlerparameter.
13-14: Please clarify the './axios' import.The import statement
import axios from './axios'suggests a local file or module named 'axios'. This is unusual, as typically, Axios would be imported directly from the 'axios' package. Could you please clarify if this is intentional, and if so, what customizations or wrapper functionality this local 'axios' module provides?To verify the existence and content of the local 'axios' file, you can run the following command:
✅ Verification successful
The './axios' import is intentional and points to a custom wrapper around the standard Axios library.
The local
axiosmodule provides extended functionalities, including mock adapters and enhanced interceptor management, which are integral to the application's HTTP handling mechanisms.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the existence and content of the local 'axios' file # Expected result: If the file exists, it should show its content. If not, it should indicate that the file is not found. fd -p ".*axios\.(js|ts)$" --exec cat {}Length of output: 15652
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/element-plus-case.test.js (1)
1-8: LGTM: Imports and module setup are well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the test's purpose, utilizing Vitest for testing, Node.js built-in modules, and necessary custom imports. This setup demonstrates good organization and adherence to testing best practices.
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/mockData.js (3)
1-7: LGTM: Well-structured mock data initializationThe initial structure of
appSchemaDemo01is well-defined with appropriate properties fordataSource,globalState,utils, andi18n. The use of empty arrays and objects for initialization is a good practice in mock data.
8-62: LGTM: Well-structured pageSchema for testingThe
pageSchemastructure accurately represents a Vue component tree with proper nesting (Page > div > ElInput). The inclusion of component properties, lifecycle hooks, and detailed metadata provides a comprehensive test case for code generation.🧰 Tools
Gitleaks
55-55: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
55-55: Address potential exposure of sensitive informationThe static analysis tool Gitleaks has flagged line 55 as potentially containing a Generic API Key. While this is a false positive (the value is a mock confirmation token, not an actual API key), it highlights the importance of using non-realistic data in mock objects.
This issue is related to the previous comment about sensitive information in the
occupierobject. By addressing that comment and using clearly fake placeholder values, we can also resolve this false positive from the static analysis tool.To ensure that no real sensitive information is accidentally included in the mock data, you can run the following command:
If this command returns any results, review them carefully to ensure they are indeed mock data and not accidentally committed real information.
✅ Verification successful
Sensitive data exposure verified as false positive
The static analysis tool Gitleaks did not detect any realistic sensitive information in the mock data after running the verification script. This confirms that the confirmation token in
mockData.jsis indeed a mock value and does not represent real sensitive data.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for realistic-looking sensitive data in mock files # Test: Search for patterns that might indicate real sensitive data rg -i '(api[_-]?key|token|secret|password|email).*?[a-f0-9]{32}' packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/Length of output: 105
🧰 Tools
Gitleaks
55-55: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/lowcode.js (1)
26-26: Verify the structure of the injectedi18nobjectOn line 26, you access
.globalfrominject(I18nInjectionKey). Depending on thevue-i18nversion and setup,inject(I18nInjectionKey)might not have aglobalproperty, which could lead toundefinederrors.Ensure that
inject(I18nInjectionKey).globalreturns a valid object withtandlocale. Run the following script to verify the structure:
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/i18n/index.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ges/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ges/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ges/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ges/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/views/DemoPage.vue
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...e-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/lowcode.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...enerator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/lowcodeConfig/dataSource.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/axios.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/axios.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/vue-generator/test/testcases/element-plus-case/expected/appdemo01/src/http/axios.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
出码包含 element-plus 时，没有引入样式。
Issue Number: #762
What is the new behavior?
增加出码插件，检测到
package.json中含有element-plus插件的时候，往 main.js 中增加 import 语句：import 'element-plus/dist/index.css'Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
appendElePlusStylePlugin.Chores
@babel/generator.