fix: Add app_i field to the t_component_library table #219
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughA new nullable integer column Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Application
participant Database
User->>Application: Create/Update ComponentLibrary (with appId)
Application->>Database: INSERT/UPDATE t_component_library (includes app_id)
Database-->>Application: Success/Failure
Application-->>User: Response
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
base/src/main/resources/mappers/ComponentLibraryMapper.xml (1)
293-293: Fix capitalization inconsistency in column aliasThere's a capitalization inconsistency in the alias -
Cl.app_idshould beCL.app_idto match the consistent style used elsewhere in the file.- Cl.app_id, + CL.app_id,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
app/src/main/resources/sql/h2/create_all_tables_ddl_v1.h2.sql(1 hunks)app/src/main/resources/sql/h2/update_all_tables_ddl.sql(1 hunks)app/src/main/resources/sql/mysql/create_all_tables_ddl_v1.mysql.sql(1 hunks)app/src/main/resources/sql/mysql/update_all_tables_ddl.sql(1 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MyMetaObjectHandler.java(1 hunks)base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/entity/ComponentLibrary.java(1 hunks)base/src/main/resources/mappers/ComponentLibraryMapper.xml(8 hunks)base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MyMetaObjectHandlerTest.java(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
app/src/main/resources/sql/h2/update_all_tables_ddl.sql (1)
31-31: Schema change looks good.The addition of a nullable
app_idinteger field to thet_component_librarytable is appropriate and well-defined. This matches the PR's stated objective.app/src/main/resources/sql/mysql/update_all_tables_ddl.sql (1)
31-31: Schema change looks good for MySQL.The addition of a nullable
app_idinteger field to thet_component_librarytable in MySQL is consistent with the H2 definition. Good job maintaining consistency across database dialects.base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MyMetaObjectHandlerTest.java (1)
39-39: Test updated correctly for the new field.The test adjustment correctly accommodates an additional field check in the
MyMetaObjectHandler.insertFill()method, increasing the expected number ofhasSettercalls from 5 to 6.app/src/main/resources/sql/h2/create_all_tables_ddl_v1.h2.sql (1)
654-654: Schema definition looks good in create script.The
app_idfield has been correctly added to the table creation script with appropriate nullable constraint and comment. This ensures consistency for newly created databases.app/src/main/resources/sql/mysql/create_all_tables_ddl_v1.mysql.sql (1)
654-654: Nullable app_id field added correctlyThe addition of
app_idas a nullable integer field to thet_component_librarytable is correctly implemented with an appropriate comment describing its purpose as an associated application ID.base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/entity/ComponentLibrary.java (1)
47-49: Entity field properly added with appropriate annotationsThe
appIdfield has been correctly added with a proper@Schemaannotation that matches the database column's purpose. UsingIntegeras the type is appropriate for a nullable field.base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/common/handler/MyMetaObjectHandler.java (1)
44-44: TenantId auto-fill strategy addedThe addition of the tenant ID auto-fill is appropriate and will ensure tenant information is consistently populated for new entities.
base/src/main/resources/mappers/ComponentLibraryMapper.xml (5)
10-10: Base column list updated with app_idThe
app_idcolumn has been correctly added to the base column list.
22-24: Condition filter added for appIdThe condition to filter by
appIdhas been properly added to support querying by application ID.
95-97: Set column operation for app_id addedThe update operation for
app_idhas been correctly implemented, allowing for modifications to this field.
165-165: Result mapping added for app_idThe result mapping correctly maps the
app_iddatabase column to theappIdentity property.
384-384: Insert operation updated for app_idThe column and value bindings have been correctly added to the insert operation to support the new field.
Also applies to: 409-409
1 participant
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests