Skip to content

Conversation

@smg247
Copy link
Member

@smg247 smg247 commented Jun 10, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 10, 2025

@smg247: This pull request references TRT-2068 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the sub-task to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 10, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from p0lyn0mial and sjenning June 10, 2025 16:27
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

@stbenjam stbenjam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we be setting other fields for Microshift?

time="2025-06-09T19:40:57Z" level=info msg="Adding the following applicable flags to the list command: --platform=skeleton --network=OVNKubernetes --network-stack= --external-connectivity=Direct" binary=k8s-tests-ext

We're leaving an empty network stack which I think is a mistake. I'm also not sure --platform=skeleton is what we really should be sending, can we identify the platform any other way?

@smg247
Copy link
Member Author

smg247 commented Jun 11, 2025

Should we be setting other fields for Microshift?

time="2025-06-09T19:40:57Z" level=info msg="Adding the following applicable flags to the list command: --platform=skeleton --network=OVNKubernetes --network-stack= --external-connectivity=Direct" binary=k8s-tests-ext

We're leaving an empty network stack which I think is a mistake. I'm also not sure --platform=skeleton is what we really should be sending, can we identify the platform any other way?

That's a good question, no other fields seem to be necessary for the currently defined rules, but it is possible that may be the case in the future. I can ask in their forum.

@pacevedom
Copy link
Contributor

Should we be setting other fields for Microshift?

time="2025-06-09T19:40:57Z" level=info msg="Adding the following applicable flags to the list command: --platform=skeleton --network=OVNKubernetes --network-stack= --external-connectivity=Direct" binary=k8s-tests-ext

We're leaving an empty network stack which I think is a mistake. I'm also not sure --platform=skeleton is what we really should be sending, can we identify the platform any other way?

We are currently using the static manifests technique, so everything that we hardcode here is safe to assume that wont change and we can include other fields too.

@smg247 smg247 changed the title TRT-2068: set topology for MicroShift to SingleReplica TRT-2068: additional defaults for MicroShift Jun 30, 2025
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 30, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 30, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: smg247, stbenjam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2525941 and 2 for PR HEAD c79bb50 in total

@smg247
Copy link
Member Author

smg247 commented Jun 30, 2025

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2525941 and 2 for PR HEAD c79bb50 in total

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Jul 1, 2025

/skip

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2525941 and 2 for PR HEAD c79bb50 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2116b0f and 1 for PR HEAD c79bb50 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@smg247: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback 38d4e28 link false /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling c79bb50 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade c79bb50 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive c79bb50 link false /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive c79bb50 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade c79bb50 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling c79bb50 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-1of2 c79bb50 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade c79bb50 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling c79bb50 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi c79bb50 link false /test e2e-gcp-csi
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 c79bb50 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-2of2 c79bb50 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2 c79bb50 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-2of2
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp c79bb50 link false /test okd-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling c79bb50 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn c79bb50 link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2 c79bb50 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-serial c79bb50 link false /test e2e-openstack-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Jul 1, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: c79bb50

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 50.00% of 2 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
---
[bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available
This test has passed 50.00% of 2 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:aws SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

Open Bugs
[CI] e2e-openstack-ovn-etcd-scaling job permanent fails at many openshift-test tests
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling Medium
[bz-openshift-apiserver] clusteroperator/openshift-apiserver should not change condition/Available
This test has passed 97.68% of 5121 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week.

@smg247
Copy link
Member Author

smg247 commented Jul 1, 2025

/retest-required

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Jul 1, 2025

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Jul 1, 2025

Tide is being a little overzealous in retesting. Also, these changes only affect microshift.

/skip
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones, ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

Details

In response to this:

Tide is being a little overzealous in retesting. Also, these changes only affect microshift.

/skip
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Jul 1, 2025

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2025

@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 5be1d97 into openshift:main Jul 1, 2025
58 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-tests
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-tests-container-v4.20.0-202507012145.p0.g5be1d97.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants