Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deal with current+desiredConfig that shouldn't happen #4357

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

freedge
Copy link

@freedge freedge commented May 7, 2024

in case the currentConfig==desiredConfig and the state is Working, the sync runs, setting the state to Working (again) and then Done (after doing nothing for 20s).
If the next sync runs immediately after (few ms after), I speculate there is a chance the data read from the informer is stale and the sync will read a "Working" state once more, and loop.

This was observed running OCP 4.12.36 on a large OpenStack deployment with some high latency. During application of machineconfigs some nodes seem to transition between Done and Working states hundreds of times, logging the "current+desiredConfig" log.

Sending this commit so hopefully someone more knowledgeable could review whether this scenario is probable.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

in case the currentConfig==desiredConfig and the state is Working, the
sync runs, setting the state to Working (again) and then Done (after
doing nothing for 20s).
If the next sync runs immediately after (few ms after), I speculate
there is a chance the data read from the informer is stale and the sync
will read a "Working" state once more, and loop.

This was observed running OCP 4.12.36 on a large OpenStack deployment
with some high latency. During application of machineconfigs some nodes
seem to transition between Done and Working states hundreds of times,
logging the "current+desiredConfig" log.

Sending this commit so hopefully someone more knowledgeable could review
whether this scenario is probable.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from cdoern and sinnykumari May 7, 2024 17:53
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label May 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 7, 2024

Hi @freedge. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: freedge
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign cdoern for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@freedge
Copy link
Author

freedge commented May 13, 2024

@freedge freedge closed this May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant