[PRE REVIEW]: mlpack 3: a fast, flexible machine learning library #703
Comments
|
Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: |
|
|
@rcurtin - many thanks for your submission. Is there anything stopping you from moving the paper into the https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack repository? This is our preferred way of handling submissions. The |
|
@arfon thanks for the quick reply. If it's necessary, we can move the paper into the repository, but to me it seems that the paper itself is a separate artifact from the code. (As time goes on, the paper itself may become out of date, for example.) I think that the Armadillo submission, which I was also involved with, had the paper in a separate place also. Let me know what you think. I see that there are some minor issues with the paper; I will handle those. But I do have a question: some of our authors chose to have no affiliation for this paper, but it looks like the paper has compiled such that their affiliation has default-chosen the first affiliation. Is there a way to specify no affiliation? I don't see anything in the documentation. |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
This is a hard requirement for us these days. Our editorial system is heavily automated and so the current layout (paper not being with the software) means manual work for our editorial team. |
|
Ok, if it is a hard requirement, we have gone ahead and merged the paper.md into the mlpack/mlpack repository. The repository is now: https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack and the paper is located at: https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/tree/master/doc/joss_paper Please let me know if that works, and if I didn't do it right just let me know and I can fix it. Thanks! |
|
@whedon generate pdf |
|
|
@whedon assign @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman as editor |
|
OK, the editor is @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman |
|
@rcurtin thanks for this submission. I'm going to start looking for reviewers. Are you able to suggest any reviewers at this point? |
|
@rcurtin minor point on the paper, can you please add DOI's to all references that have them. Thanks. |
|
Review invitation. @MikeInnes @betatim @rasbt @cxhernandez @mlgill @rhiever would you be interested in reviewing this submission? |
|
i would be happy to do that. Timeline-wise, I think I will be able to get started on that later this week or next weekend. |
|
OK, the reviewer is @rasbt |
|
I'll initiate the actual review process shortly but aim to wait for some more reviewers to join. |
|
I'll review (my time for it might be a bit scattered over the next couple of weeks though). |
|
I can do it next week if a third is needed.
… On May 7, 2018, at 5:08 AM, Mike J Innes ***@***.***> wrote:
I'll review (my time for it might be a bit scattered over the next couple of weeks though).
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
|
@whedon add @MikeInnes as reviewer |
|
OK, @MikeInnes is now a reviewer |
whedon
assigned Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, mlgill and rasbt and unassigned rasbt and Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
|
OK, @mlgill is now a reviewer |
|
@whedon start review magic-word=bananas |
|
OK, I've started the review over in #726. Feel free to close this issue now! |
|
Okay @rcurtin @mlgill @rasbt @MikeInnes I've started the review issue over at #726 |
|
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman: thanks for your help with this! I didn't have any suggested reviewers. |
Submitting author: @rcurtin (Ryan Curtin)
Repository: https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack
Version: v3.0.0
Editor: @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
Reviewers: @rasbt, @MikeInnes, @mlgill
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @rcurtin. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@rcurtin if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: