You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The paper sources don't serve a directly useful purpose to the users of the software. Having a single pdf would be more useful (ie. it would be immediately viewable).
It would be good to clean this up and move the sources to a separate repo, in similar vein to the joss_paper for mlpack. As an added bonus, the modified arxiv version of the paper can be kept in the same repo.
(PS. I'm happy to do the actual moving / cleanup / etc.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sounds good to me, and as long as the paper and the potential joss paper is in the same repo as the main code we are fine (openjournals/joss-reviews#703 (comment)).
The paper sources don't serve a directly useful purpose to the users of the software. Having a single pdf would be more useful (ie. it would be immediately viewable).
It would be good to clean this up and move the sources to a separate repo, in similar vein to the joss_paper for mlpack. As an added bonus, the modified arxiv version of the paper can be kept in the same repo.
(PS. I'm happy to do the actual moving / cleanup / etc.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: