Skip to content

8353276: C2: simplify PhaseMacroExpand::opt_bits_test #26276

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sarannat
Copy link
Contributor

@sarannat sarannat commented Jul 11, 2025

Issue
The last three parameters of PhaseMacroExpand::opt_bits_test(Node* ctrl, Node* region, int edge, Node* word, int mask, int bits, bool return_fast_path) are unnecessary after the fix introduced in JDK-8256425

Fix
The proposed fix removes the last three parameters and makes the necessary modification to the methods.

Testing
GitHub Actions
tier1 to tier5 on windows-x64, linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macosx-x64, and macosx-aarch64.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8353276: C2: simplify PhaseMacroExpand::opt_bits_test (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26276/head:pull/26276
$ git checkout pull/26276

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26276
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26276/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26276

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26276

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26276.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back snatarajan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 11, 2025

@sarannat This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 11, 2025

@sarannat The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@sarannat sarannat marked this pull request as ready for review July 11, 2025 22:21
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 11, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 11, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, it looks good, thanks for cleaning it up!

Comment on lines 97 to 98
Node* cmp;
if (mask != 0) {
Node* and_node = transform_later(new AndXNode(word, MakeConX(mask)));
cmp = transform_later(new CmpXNode(and_node, MakeConX(bits)));
} else {
cmp = word;
}
cmp = word;
Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn Jul 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could now be merged (I cannot make a direct suggestion due to deleted lines):

Node* cmp = word;

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you. I have addressed this in the new commit

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 14, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants