Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate new aggregation subsystem based content importer module #1361
Integrate new aggregation subsystem based content importer module #1361
Changes from all commits
692128a
90b86d0
e94c5bb
3031c79
36606ab
8cf1b38
2439e41
d481c39
4c1b3a2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This particular change could be confusing but it is bound to a specific commit which is closing the #1342 issue spotted when working on #1298.
Maybe it is not worth to elevate it to a dedicated PR but we should find a nice way to indicate this solution somehow in the commit comment once the commits get squshed before the merge.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I was surprised at first but found the reason for this change.
I personally prefer just not squashing, but adding "Also closes #1342, which was found during this work, by going to content-url-dedup from decision-existence-filter in the content_url_chain" should be enough, I think.