Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[StepSecurity] Apply security best practices #1010

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

step-security-bot
Copy link

Summary

This pull request is created by Secure Repo at the request of @RafaelGSS. Please merge the Pull Request to incorporate the requested changes. Please tag @RafaelGSS on your message if you have any questions related to the PR. You can also engage with the StepSecurity team by tagging @step-security-bot.

Refs: nodejs/security-wg#859

Security Fixes

Least Privileged GitHub Actions Token Permissions

The GITHUB_TOKEN is an automatically generated secret to make authenticated calls to the GitHub API. GitHub recommends setting minimum token permissions for the GITHUB_TOKEN.

Pinned Dependencies

GitHub Action tags and Docker tags are mutatble. This poses a security risk. GitHub's Security Hardening guide recommends pinning actions to full length commit.

Add OpenSSF Scorecard Workflow

OpenSSF Scorecard is an automated tool that assesses a number of important heuristics ("checks") associated with software security and assigns each check a score of 0-10. You can use these scores to understand specific areas to improve in order to strengthen the security posture of your project.

Scorecard workflow also allows maintainers to display a Scorecard badge on their repository to show off their hard work.

Feedback

For bug reports, feature requests, and general feedback; please create an issue in step-security/secure-repo. To create such PRs, please visit https://app.stepsecurity.io/securerepo.

Signed-off-by: StepSecurity Bot [email protected]

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 10, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b8193a7) 96.44% compared to head (d5f8b9a) 96.44%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1010   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.44%   96.44%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        2139     2139           
=======================================
  Hits         2063     2063           
  Misses         76       76           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@@ -14,12 +14,12 @@ jobs:

steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
uses: actions/checkout@8ade135a41bc03ea155e62e844d188df1ea18608 # v4.1.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This imo is like pinning deps in package.json; not worth the trouble. We won’t get bugfixes and whatnot automatically by doing this.

Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB Oct 10, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unless this bot also sends PRs (or some other bot does). Seems very noisy, tho...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dependabot works with pinned actions too. We're extensively using it already on nodejs/core. See: nodejs/security-wg#1126

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does indeed, but that makes it very noisy. I don’t think it’s worth it, especially from official Github actions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants