Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Developing risk table based on AFSC #14

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sbreitbart-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Added @BenWilliams-NOAA 's comma function from the AFSC safe package
  • Started making risk table based on AFSC's SAFE main table. Copy/pasted Ben's code, then started adding code to extract specific variables, like total biomass, from model output file
  • Stopped so that we could examine example AFSC model output and decide how to proceed

@BenWilliams-NOAA
Copy link

@sbreitbart-NOAA for clarification, this is the 'main table' which is pretty much the first thing our council, ssc, and ap look at. At the afsc a risk table is a qualitative indicator used to determine whether there should be a reduction in catch below maxABC .
The main table is created by pulling from the prior assessment table (if it exists) and incorporated into the parent document for consistency in reported values.

@sbreitbart-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@sbreitbart-NOAA for clarification, this is the 'main table' which is pretty much the first thing our council, ssc, and ap look at. At the afsc a risk table is a qualitative indicator used to determine whether there should be a reduction in catch below maxABC . The main table is created by pulling from the prior assessment table (if it exists) and incorporated into the parent document for consistency in reported values.

Hi @BenWilliams-NOAA - thanks for letting me know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants