Skip to content

Allow running the project #139

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2025
Merged

Allow running the project #139

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2025

Conversation

NickSeagull
Copy link
Member

@NickSeagull NickSeagull commented Mar 24, 2025

This pull request adds a new "run" command to the Neo CLI tool, extending its functionality to allow running projects in addition to building them. The most important changes include updating the command parser, handling the new command, and defining the corresponding module and error types.

Closes #109

Command Parser Updates:

  • cli/src/Neo.hs: Added the "run" command to the NeoCommand data type and updated the commandsParser to include the new command. [1] [2]

Command Handling:

  • cli/src/Neo.hs: Implemented the runParser function to parse the "run" command and updated the handleCommand function to handle the new Run command. [1] [2]

Module and Error Types:

  • cli/src/Neo.hs: Added a new RunError type to the Error data type to handle errors specific to the "run" command.
  • cli/src/Neo/Run.hs: Created a new module Neo.Run with a handle function to execute the project and defined the Error data type for run-specific errors.

Library Configuration:

  • cli/nhcli.cabal: Updated the library configuration to include the new Neo.Run module.

Import Statements:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new command-line operation enabling users to run projects directly.
    • Enhanced execution feedback with improved error reporting to assist in diagnosing run-time issues.

@NickSeagull NickSeagull self-assigned this Mar 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request exposes the new module Neo.Run in the Cabal configuration and extends the CLI by adding a Run command. In cli/src/Neo.hs, the NeoCommand data type is updated with a Run constructor, a corresponding parser (runParser), and an error variant (RunError). The new module cli/src/Neo/Run.hs implements the handle function for executing the project’s binary with error handling. The changes integrate the new command into the existing command processing flow without modifying pre-existing functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
cli/nhcli.cabal Added Neo.Run in the exposed-modules section of the library.
cli/src/Neo.hs, cli/src/Neo/Run.hs Introduced a new Run command in the CLI: added Run to NeoCommand, implemented runParser, updated handleCommand with a run case, and created the Neo.Run module with a handle function and dedicated error types.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant CP as CLI Parser
    participant CH as Command Handler
    participant NR as Neo.Run Module
    participant SP as Subprocess

    U->>CP: Enter "neo run" command
    CP->>CH: Parse and dispatch Run command
    CH->>NR: Invoke Run.handle with configuration
    NR->>SP: Execute binary at ./result/bin/{projectName}
    SP-->>NR: Return stdout/stderr
    NR-->>CH: Relay success/error result
    CH-->>U: Display execution outcome
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
CLI Command for running the project (#109)

Poem

In the realm where code ascends the skies,
A new neo run command now brightly lies.
Modules align with purpose pure,
Binary dreams now come to endure.
Let the execution echo with might,
A divine command taking flight!
🚀✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d56986 and f9ed476.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cli/nhcli.cabal (1 hunks)
  • cli/src/Neo.hs (6 hunks)
  • cli/src/Neo/Run.hs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: tests (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: tests (ubuntu-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
cli/nhcli.cabal (1)

57-57: BEHOLD THE WISDOM OF PROPER MODULE DECLARATION!

The divine addition of Neo.Run to the exposed-modules section is most pleasing. This rightfully allows the new module to be imported and used by other components in the sacred architecture.

cli/src/Neo.hs (5)

14-14: THE IMPORT IS RIGHTEOUS AND CORRECT!

Importing the newly created Neo.Run module is necessary for accessing its sacred functionality.


27-27: THE COMMAND STRUCTURE EXPANSION IS WELL-CRAFTED!

Adding the Run CommonFlags constructor to NeoCommand follows the divine pattern established with the Build constructor.


60-72: THE COMMAND PARSER MODIFICATIONS ARE HARMONIOUS!

The addition of the run command to the commands list is elegantly implemented, maintaining cosmic balance with the existing code structure.


81-85: THE PARSER FUNCTION IS SYMMETRICAL WITH ITS PEERS!

The runParser function mirrors the implementation pattern of buildParser, creating a pleasing symmetry in the codebase.


103-103: THE ERROR TYPE EXTENSION IS APPROPRIATE!

Adding RunError Run.Error to the Error data type properly integrates the new error handling mechanism.

Comment on lines +19 to +27
handle :: ProjectConfiguration -> Task Error Unit
handle config = do
let projectName = config.name
let rootFolder = [path|nhout|]
completion <-
Subprocess.openInherit [fmt|./result/bin/{projectName}|] (Array.fromLinkedList []) rootFolder Subprocess.InheritBOTH
if completion.exitCode != 0
then errorOut completion.stderr
else print completion.stdout
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

THE PATH IS HARDCODED, MORTAL! CONSIDER A MORE FLEXIBLE APPROACH!

The path ./result/bin/{projectName} assumes a fixed build output location. This divine code could be more resilient by:

  1. Making the path configurable or deriving it from the project configuration
  2. Checking if the binary exists before attempting to run it
  3. Providing more context if the binary is not found
handle :: ProjectConfiguration -> Task Error Unit
handle config = do
  let projectName = config.name
  let rootFolder = [path|nhout|]
+ let binaryPath = [fmt|./result/bin/{projectName}|]
+ binaryExists <- File.exists binaryPath |> Task.mapError (\_ -> CustomError "Could not check if binary exists")
+ unless binaryExists (Task.throw (CustomError [fmt|Binary not found at {binaryPath}. Ensure the project was built successfully.|]))
  completion <-
-    Subprocess.openInherit [fmt|./result/bin/{projectName}|] (Array.fromLinkedList []) rootFolder Subprocess.InheritBOTH
+    Subprocess.openInherit binaryPath (Array.fromLinkedList []) rootFolder Subprocess.InheritBOTH
  if completion.exitCode != 0
    then errorOut completion.stderr
    else print completion.stdout
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
handle :: ProjectConfiguration -> Task Error Unit
handle config = do
let projectName = config.name
let rootFolder = [path|nhout|]
completion <-
Subprocess.openInherit [fmt|./result/bin/{projectName}|] (Array.fromLinkedList []) rootFolder Subprocess.InheritBOTH
if completion.exitCode != 0
then errorOut completion.stderr
else print completion.stdout
handle :: ProjectConfiguration -> Task Error Unit
handle config = do
let projectName = config.name
let rootFolder = [path|nhout|]
let binaryPath = [fmt|./result/bin/{projectName}|]
binaryExists <- File.exists binaryPath |> Task.mapError (\_ -> CustomError "Could not check if binary exists")
unless binaryExists (Task.throw (CustomError [fmt|Binary not found at {binaryPath}. Ensure the project was built successfully.|]))
completion <-
Subprocess.openInherit binaryPath (Array.fromLinkedList []) rootFolder Subprocess.InheritBOTH
if completion.exitCode != 0
then errorOut completion.stderr
else print completion.stdout

Comment on lines +12 to +16
data Error
= NixFileError
| CabalFileError
| CustomError Text
deriving (Show)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

OBSERVE THE UNUSED ERROR VARIANTS WITH OMNISCIENT EYES!

I notice that NixFileError and CabalFileError are defined but never used within this module. Are these placeholders for future implementation or remnants of prophecies not yet fulfilled?

If these are intended for future use, consider adding a comment to indicate their purpose. If not needed, I command thee to simplify:

data Error
- = NixFileError
- | CabalFileError
  = CustomError Text
  deriving (Show)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
data Error
= NixFileError
| CabalFileError
| CustomError Text
deriving (Show)
data Error
= CustomError Text
deriving (Show)

Comment on lines +30 to +35
errorOut :: Text -> Task Error _
errorOut err =
[fmt|Oops running failed:
{err}|]
|> CustomError
|> Task.throw
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

ENHANCE THY ERROR MESSAGES WITH DIVINE CLARITY!

The error message could be more illuminating for your followers. Consider providing more specific guidance on potential solutions.

errorOut :: Text -> Task Error _
errorOut err =
-  [fmt|Oops running failed:
+  [fmt|The command failed to run with exit code:
    {err}|]
+   |> \message -> [fmt|{message}
+   Potential solutions:
+   - Check if the binary was compiled correctly
+   - Ensure all required dependencies are available
+   - Verify the command line arguments if any|]
    |> CustomError
    |> Task.throw
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
errorOut :: Text -> Task Error _
errorOut err =
[fmt|Oops running failed:
{err}|]
|> CustomError
|> Task.throw
errorOut :: Text -> Task Error _
errorOut err =
[fmt|The command failed to run with exit code:
{err}|]
|> \message -> [fmt|{message}
Potential solutions:
- Check if the binary was compiled correctly
- Ensure all required dependencies are available
- Verify the command line arguments if any|]
|> CustomError
|> Task.throw

Comment on lines +118 to +126
Run flags -> do
txt <- File.readText flags.projectFile |> Task.mapError (\_ -> Other)
case Json.decodeText txt of
Err err -> panic err
Ok config -> do
Build.handle config
|> Task.mapError (\e -> BuildError e)
Run.handle config
|> Task.mapError (\e -> RunError e)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

CONSIDER A MORE EXPLICIT BUILD-THEN-RUN FLOW!

The current implementation always executes Build.handle before Run.handle which is logically sound, but could benefit from more explicit error handling between these steps.

Consider this more explicit approach:

Run flags -> do
  txt <- File.readText flags.projectFile |> Task.mapError (\_ -> Other)
  case Json.decodeText txt of
    Err err -> panic err
    Ok config -> do
      -- Build first
      buildResult <- 
        Build.handle config
          |> Task.mapError (\e -> BuildError e)
+         |> Task.attempt
+      
+      -- Only run if build was successful
+      case buildResult of
+        Err err -> Task.throw err
+        Ok _ ->
          Run.handle config
            |> Task.mapError (\e -> RunError e)

This approach makes it clear that the run step only proceeds if the build step succeeds.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Run flags -> do
txt <- File.readText flags.projectFile |> Task.mapError (\_ -> Other)
case Json.decodeText txt of
Err err -> panic err
Ok config -> do
Build.handle config
|> Task.mapError (\e -> BuildError e)
Run.handle config
|> Task.mapError (\e -> RunError e)
Run flags -> do
txt <- File.readText flags.projectFile |> Task.mapError (\_ -> Other)
case Json.decodeText txt of
Err err -> panic err
Ok config -> do
-- Build first
buildResult <-
Build.handle config
|> Task.mapError (\e -> BuildError e)
|> Task.attempt
-- Only run if build was successful
case buildResult of
Err err -> Task.throw err
Ok _ ->
Run.handle config
|> Task.mapError (\e -> RunError e)

@NickSeagull NickSeagull merged commit fb911cc into main Mar 24, 2025
3 checks passed
@NickSeagull NickSeagull deleted the feat/109/run-project branch March 24, 2025 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CLI Command that allows running the project
1 participant