Upgrade datafusion #2056
Merged
Upgrade datafusion #2056
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
twitu
force-pushed
the
upgrade-datafusion
branch
from
38eb1d3
to
db25582
Compare
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #2056 will degrade performances by 12.03%Comparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
Pushkarm029
pushed a commit
to Pushkarm029/nautilus_trader
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request
Fix changes needed for datafusion v43. Subtle internal change to how String arrays, particularly for
trade_idcolumn is read by datafusion.Type of change
How has this change been tested?
Tests were run