Refactor to include u in the output field #142
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your contributions. If you haven't already, please send a signed Contributor License Agreement (CLA) to Christopher Teubert ([email protected]). CLAs can be found here: https://github.com/nasa/progpy/tree/master/forms. Also, make sure you're familiar with the developer notes and contributing sections of our developers guide, https://nasa.github.io/progpy/dev_guide.html#notes-for-developers
3 tasks
|
Going to try the "passthrough" suggestion mentioned in #141 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #141 by introducing a "u" parameter to the signature. I made it
Noneby default so that existing implementations of StateEstimator classes and PrognosticModels need not change.