-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 141
dts: qcom: msm8916-mf601xx, msm8916-mf32: initial support #360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This commit adds support for the MF32 series WiFi/LTE dongle made by Tong Heng Wei Chuang based on MSM8916. Compared to previous UFI-001C, MF32 ships more peripherals, such as battery/charger, SD Card slot, more LEDs and buttons etc. Note: The original firmware does not support 64-bit OS. It is necessary to flash 64-bit TZ firmware to boot arm64. Note: The original firmware works on 750MHz, It is necessary to downgrade cpu frequency Currently supported: - All CPU cores - Buttons - LEDs - Modem - SDHC - USB Device Mode / Host Mode - UART Signed-off-by: Coia Prant <[email protected]>
Document the new thwc,mf32-v2 device tree bindings used in their device trees. Signed-off-by: Coia Prant <[email protected]>
This commit adds support for the MF601 series WiFi/LTE dongle made by Tong Heng Wei Chuang based on MSM8916. Compared to previous UFI-001C, MF601 ships more peripherals, such as battery/charger, SD Card slot, more LEDs and buttons etc. Note: The original firmware does not support 64-bit OS. It is necessary to flash 64-bit TZ firmware to boot arm64. Note: The original firmware works on 750MHz, It is necessary to downgrade cpu frequency Currently supported: - All CPU cores - Buttons - LEDs - Modem - SDHC - USB Device Mode / Host Mode - UART Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <[email protected]> Tested-by: Coia Prant <[email protected]>
Document the new thwc,mf601sl-v7 device tree bindings used in their device trees. Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <[email protected]>
All of them already have arm64 support in mainline. But for the following reasons, it might be appropriate to add arm32 aupport: 1. arm64 is only supoorted with an updated tz. It's quite dangerous to flash tz, and it will break the downstream Android system. 2. arm64 consumes more RAM than arm32, which can not be ignored due to only 512 MiB of RAM (~320MiB available) for these devices. So add arm32 support for them, even when arm64 is available. Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Coia Prant <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You will also need to sign off on every patches authored by yourself.
0003-arm64-dts-qcom-msm8916-thwc-mf601xx-Add-initial-devi.patch:333: ERROR:NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Coia Prant <[email protected]>'
0004-dt-bindings-qcom-Document-msm8916-thwc-mf601sl-v7.patch:28: ERROR:NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Coia Prant <[email protected]>'
- thwc,mf601sl-v7 | ||
- thwc,mf32-v2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- thwc,mf32-v2
- thwc,mf601sl-v7
- thwc,uf896
- thwc,ufi001c
qcom-msm8916-thwc-uf896.dtb \ | ||
qcom-msm8916-thwc-ufi001c.dtb \ | ||
qcom-msm8916-thwc-mf601sl-v7.dtb \ | ||
qcom-msm8916-thwc-mf32-v2.dtb \ | ||
qcom-msm8916-yiming-uz801v3.dtb \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
qcom-msm8916-thwc-uf896.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-thwc-ufi001c.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-thwc-mf601sl-v7.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-thwc-mf32-v2.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-yiming-uz801v3.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-thwc-mf32-v2.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-thwc-mf601sl-v7.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-thwc-uf896.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-thwc-ufi001c.dtb \ | |
qcom-msm8916-yiming-uz801v3.dtb \ |
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-mf601sl-v7.dtb | ||
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-mf32-v2.dtb |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-mf32-v2.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-mf601sl-v7.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-uf896.dtb
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-ufi001c.dtb
}; | ||
|
||
&leds { | ||
led-wan-green { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sort the nodes in alphabetical order or GPIO pins.
}; | ||
|
||
&leds { | ||
led-wan-green { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sort.
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only | |||
#include "arm64/qcom/msm8916-thwc-mf32-v2.dts" | |||
#include "qcom-msm8916-smp.dtsi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bit of weird without newline.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please also check what checkpatch complains about.
Also probably want to look at the commit authorship since I see two s-o-b on most of them but i.e. no Co-developed-by:
or [changelog]
note to show why two people handled these commits.
So please:
- Make sure all commits have s-o-b of the author.
- If you want to give additional attribution to Yang, add either:
Co-developed-by:
+ s-o-b from Yang (or from you if Yang is suppsed to be the Author:), or- a note like
[Coia: Added x y z]
+ s-o-b
Thanks for working on this!
|
||
/dts-v1/; | ||
|
||
#include "msm8916-thwc-mf32.dtsi" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would this dtsi be used by some other device later? You may want to motivate this in the commit message.
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ properties: | |||
- samsung,serranove | |||
- thwc,uf896 | |||
- thwc,ufi001c | |||
- thwc,mf32-v2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please reorder commits so that the dt-bindings is always before the usage of the binding (i.e. first bindings then dts that uses it)
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-samsung-on7.dtb | |||
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-samsung-serranove.dtb | |||
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-uf896.dtb | |||
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-ufi001c.dtb | |||
dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += msm8916-thwc-mf601sl-v7.dtb |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Authorship on this commit looks weird weird...
From e0513f159f005d12f1ba91716bc4f0b405498059 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Coia Prant <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 10:24:54 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916-thwc-mf601xx: Add initial device
tree
...
Signed-off-by: Yang Xiwen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Coia Prant <[email protected]>
You're designated as an author but sob is from Yang, then there is your tested-by, which looks weird as author's testing their own patch is implied...
…ode. [ Upstream commit d5c367e ] creating a large files during checkpoint disable until it runs out of space and then delete it, then remount to enable checkpoint again, and then unmount the filesystem triggers the f2fs_bug_on as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:896! CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1286 Comm: umount Not tainted 6.11.0-rc7-dirty msm8916-mainline#360 Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x58c/0x610 Call Trace: __die_body+0x15/0x60 die+0x33/0x50 do_trap+0x10a/0x120 f2fs_evict_inode+0x58c/0x610 do_error_trap+0x60/0x80 f2fs_evict_inode+0x58c/0x610 exc_invalid_op+0x53/0x60 f2fs_evict_inode+0x58c/0x610 asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 f2fs_evict_inode+0x58c/0x610 evict+0x101/0x260 dispose_list+0x30/0x50 evict_inodes+0x140/0x190 generic_shutdown_super+0x2f/0x150 kill_block_super+0x11/0x40 kill_f2fs_super+0x7d/0x140 deactivate_locked_super+0x2a/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0xb3/0x140 task_work_run+0x61/0x90 The root cause is: creating large files during disable checkpoint period results in not enough free segments, so when writing back root inode will failed in f2fs_enable_checkpoint. When umount the file system after enabling checkpoint, the root inode is dirty in f2fs_evict_inode function, which triggers BUG_ON. The steps to reproduce are as follows: dd if=/dev/zero of=f2fs.img bs=1M count=55 mount f2fs.img f2fs_dir -o checkpoint=disable:10% dd if=/dev/zero of=big bs=1M count=50 sync rm big mount -o remount,checkpoint=enable f2fs_dir umount f2fs_dir Let's redirty inode when there is not free segments during checkpoint is disable. Signed-off-by: Qi Han <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Previous pull request see #329 #310
Tested MF601SL_CT_V07 and MF32_MB_V2 devices.