-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix typo in determining _TestArchitecture
#5087
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ | |||
<!-- | ||||
NETCoreSdkRuntimeIdentifier is used by DefaultAppHostRuntimeIdentifier to figure out the architecture, and is defined also for .NET Framework. | ||||
--> | ||||
<_TestArchitecture Condition="('$(_TestArchitecture)' == '' or '$(_TestArchitecture)' == 'AnyCpu') and '$(NETCoreSdkRuntimeIdentifier)' != ''">$([System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex]::Replace($(DefaultAppHostRuntimeIdentifier), '.*-', ''))</_TestArchitecture> | ||||
<_TestArchitecture Condition="('$(_TestArchitecture)' == '' or '$(_TestArchitecture)' == 'AnyCpu') and '$(NETCoreSdkRuntimeIdentifier)' != ''">$([System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex]::Replace($(NETCoreSdkRuntimeIdentifier), '.*-', ''))</_TestArchitecture> | ||||
<!-- If everyting else fails, fallback to x64. --> | ||||
<_TestArchitecture Condition="'$(_TestArchitecture)' == '' or '$(_TestArchitecture)' == 'AnyCpu'">x64</_TestArchitecture> | ||||
Comment on lines
344
to
345
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Evangelink This looks suspicious. I don't know how we can reach this "fallback" case. But if we do, I think we should use whatever There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @MarcoRossignoli do you recall? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. #5091 suggests a larger change to how InvokeTestingPlatformTask work. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Merging for now as-is and we can address this concern later if #5091 isn't going to happen soon. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I believe it was me who wrote some of the code in test anywhere repo and lot of the comments :) see 330, the _testArchitecture is used for log naming, we don't use it to influence which architecture will run, instead we just try to guess what is the architecture of the exe we run. So when user builds for arm64 and runs they would see _arm64 in the log names, and not _x64. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. just posted above 1 min ago :) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current implementation does that. testfx/src/Platform/Microsoft.Testing.Platform.MSBuild/Tasks/InvokeTestingPlatformTask.cs Line 172 in cd21e24
It tries to resolve There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. #3703 that was introduced here, long time after the comment. So I stand corrected. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Makes sense. Anyways, I think #5091 would be the ultimate path forward |
||||
<TestingPlatformShowTestsFailure Condition=" '$(TestingPlatformShowTestsFailure)' == '' ">False</TestingPlatformShowTestsFailure> | ||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a copy from line 339, but when it was copy-pasted, the condition was modified but the actual value is not. The code is meaningless on its current form.