Skip to content

Conversation

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist commented Nov 19, 2025

Motivation for this change

to replace the combined used of set0P et negPn

fyi @IshiguroYoshihiro

Checklist
  • added corresponding entries in CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md

- [ ] added corresponding documentation in the headers

Reference: How to document

Merge policy

As a rule of thumb:

  • PRs with several commits that make sense individually and that
    all compile are preferentially merged into master.
  • PRs with disorganized commits are very likely to be squash-rebased.
Reminder to reviewers

Co-authored-by: IshiguroYoshihiro <[email protected]>
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist force-pushed the classical_sets_20251119 branch from d100bce to 69e4959 Compare November 19, 2025 08:18
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added the enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library label Nov 19, 2025
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 1.15.0 milestone Nov 19, 2025
by rewrite eqEsubset; split.
Qed.

Lemma not_nonemptyP A : ~ (A !=set0) <-> A = set0.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nonemptyPn?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants