Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate Multiple Scattering options for Forward and Backward classes #73

Closed
GuiMacielPereira opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #76
Closed

Separate Multiple Scattering options for Forward and Backward classes #73

GuiMacielPereira opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #76
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@GuiMacielPereira
Copy link
Collaborator

Problem
The current script assumes that the same Multiple scattering options will be used for both backward and forward scattering analysis:
image

This is not always the case for some rare cases.

Solution
Separate these options into the Forward and Backward classes each, so the classes do not share the same attributes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant