Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CPPCheck Team Bravo Set 50 #38716
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
CPPCheck Team Bravo Set 50 #38716
Changes from all commits
e37ebef
bcae379
ee10d34
f5b9032
9e743d2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You've got the same code in two separate functions in different classes, both called
extractDouble
, the idea is to have the code in one place, because otherwise you may as well just put the duplicate code inline in both places. Because the method is needed in different classes you could either add a static method to the file, or put it on the common base class,Packet
, (second option sounds better to me).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be using the new
extractDouble
function you're adding.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
minorVersion
shouldn't be deleted, because that can change withversion
, you only need to delete the staticminor_version
, then the check becomesminorVersion() >= 0 && type != InvalidStream;
At the moment the type check has gone as well, but we want to maintain existing behaviour.