-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove symmetry elements for SaveINS #38605
Open
zjmorgan
wants to merge
12
commits into
release-next
Choose a base branch
from
fix_save_ins
base: release-next
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+186
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Can we get a milestone on this so we know whether we're trying to get it into v6.12 or not? |
zjmorgan
added
Diffraction
Issues and pull requests related to diffraction
Single Crystal
Issues and pull requests related to single crystal
Bug
Issues and pull requests that are regressions or would be considered a bug by users (e.g. crashing)
labels
Jan 15, 2025
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
- Fix :ref:`SaveINS<algm-SaveINS-v1>` that saved all symmetry records to file. Only the minimum are needed that can be generated by translation/rotation corresponding to the lattice type. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this needs to move a level deeper, into the Bugfixes
folder
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug
Issues and pull requests that are regressions or would be considered a bug by users (e.g. crashing)
Diffraction
Issues and pull requests related to diffraction
Single Crystal
Issues and pull requests related to single crystal
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of work
SaveINS
incorrectly includes all symmetry elements and should not include identity, inversion, or any that can be generated by the lattice centering translations.Summary of work
Redundant symmetry elements that can be generated by the underlying centering condition or rotoinversion should be removed. In addition, identity does not need to be included.
To test:
Run the additional system tests. Or, run this example. Choose any space group. Go to link https://cci.lbl.gov/cctbx/shelx.html and enter the same space group symbol. Cross check that it gives the same symmetry operators. Order does not matter.
Reviewer
Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.
Code Review
Functional Tests
Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of
@mantidproject/gatekeepers
will take care of it.Gatekeeper
If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.