Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AlignAndFocusPowderSlim prototype #38279

Draft
wants to merge 43 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

peterfpeterson
Copy link
Member

@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson commented Oct 22, 2024

This still has #38455 in it. Once that is merged this will be significantly smaller.

Description of work

Summary of work

Fixes #xxxx.

Further detail of work

To test:


Reviewer

Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.

Code Review

  • Is the code of an acceptable quality?
  • Does the code conform to the coding standards?
  • Are the unit tests small and test the class in isolation?
  • If there is GUI work does it follow the GUI standards?
  • If there are changes in the release notes then do they describe the changes appropriately?
  • Do the release notes conform to the release notes guide?

Functional Tests

  • Do changes function as described? Add comments below that describe the tests performed?
  • Do the changes handle unexpected situations, e.g. bad input?
  • Has the relevant (user and developer) documentation been added/updated?

Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of @mantidproject/gatekeepers will take care of it.

Gatekeeper

If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.

@sf1919
Copy link
Contributor

sf1919 commented Oct 23, 2024

I won't re-run tests on this on as it genuinely fails AlignAndFocusPowderSlimTest. I expect other commits will be pushed.

@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson force-pushed the ewm6343_aafpff_slim branch 2 times, most recently from 4e13c5c to 57a16ad Compare November 7, 2024 18:04
@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson force-pushed the ewm6343_aafpff_slim branch 2 times, most recently from dec7fda to eef6346 Compare November 18, 2024 21:42
@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson force-pushed the ewm6343_aafpff_slim branch 2 times, most recently from c94d1da to 8b01ea8 Compare December 26, 2024 17:53
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Dec 27, 2024
Copy link

👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson,

Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson removed the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Dec 27, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Jan 2, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson,

Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Jan 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Jan 7, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2025

👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson,

Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson force-pushed the ewm6343_aafpff_slim branch 2 times, most recently from 824cd74 to 1613e00 Compare January 7, 2025 18:24
@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson removed the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Jan 7, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Jan 8, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson,

Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson removed the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Jan 8, 2025
@peterfpeterson peterfpeterson force-pushed the ewm6343_aafpff_slim branch 2 times, most recently from 55ea2d1 to 2801046 Compare January 10, 2025 12:43
pre-commit-ci bot and others added 27 commits January 16, 2025 17:21
This is a squashed version of mantidproject#38564

Clear events in frame if not good frame

In preparation for next frame

Update cpp check suppression

The condition ++numWordsSkipped is always true, but it will only get evaluated if !file.seekg(SKIP_WORD_SIZE, std::ios_base::cur).eof() is true which will indicate a word being skipped, so this does actually have a function!

Update test to assert no events if min=max=0

Add release note

Fix cpp check supression
This is a squashed version of mantidproject#38459

fix typo to trigger cppcheck run

Remove cppcheck suppressions temporarily for cppcheck update

Update cppcheck to 2.16.0

Suppress class_X_Y cppcheck warnings.

Restrict cppcheck to unix only. There is no 2.16.0 for Windows.

We can re-add it for Windows in the future if it is reinstated.
For the time being, since nobody is running it locally, we don't really
need it to be installed on Windows.

Sort cppcheck supressions by file name and line number

Group internal cppcheck errors to extract them from the bounty list

Update cppcheck suppressions for v2.16.0
…_16_ornlnext

Update cppcheck to 2.16.0 - ornlnext
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson,

Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Has Conflicts Used by the bot to label pull requests that have conflicts
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.