-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AlignAndFocusPowderSlim prototype #38279
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
AlignAndFocusPowderSlim prototype #38279
Conversation
I won't re-run tests on this on as it genuinely fails |
540c68d
to
4394803
Compare
4394803
to
d523b88
Compare
4e13c5c
to
57a16ad
Compare
dec7fda
to
eef6346
Compare
c94d1da
to
8b01ea8
Compare
👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
8b01ea8
to
4b1db75
Compare
👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
4b1db75
to
9a08782
Compare
9a08782
to
93a2eb1
Compare
👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
824cd74
to
1613e00
Compare
1613e00
to
403a1ac
Compare
👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
403a1ac
to
c6bc28b
Compare
55ea2d1
to
2801046
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
This is a squashed version of mantidproject#38564 Clear events in frame if not good frame In preparation for next frame Update cpp check suppression The condition ++numWordsSkipped is always true, but it will only get evaluated if !file.seekg(SKIP_WORD_SIZE, std::ios_base::cur).eof() is true which will indicate a word being skipped, so this does actually have a function! Update test to assert no events if min=max=0 Add release note Fix cpp check supression
This is a squashed version of mantidproject#38459 fix typo to trigger cppcheck run Remove cppcheck suppressions temporarily for cppcheck update Update cppcheck to 2.16.0 Suppress class_X_Y cppcheck warnings. Restrict cppcheck to unix only. There is no 2.16.0 for Windows. We can re-add it for Windows in the future if it is reinstated. For the time being, since nobody is running it locally, we don't really need it to be installed on Windows. Sort cppcheck supressions by file name and line number Group internal cppcheck errors to extract them from the bounty list Update cppcheck suppressions for v2.16.0
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
…_16_ornlnext Update cppcheck to 2.16.0 - ornlnext
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
d1c9962
to
587b566
Compare
👋 Hi, @peterfpeterson, Conflicts have been detected against the base branch. Please rebase your branch against the base branch. |
This still has #38455 in it. Once that is merged this will be significantly smaller.
Description of work
Summary of work
Fixes #xxxx.
Further detail of work
To test:
Reviewer
Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.
Code Review
Functional Tests
Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of
@mantidproject/gatekeepers
will take care of it.Gatekeeper
If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.