Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v5 #320

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

v5 #320

merged 12 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

ludeknovy
Copy link
Owner

@ludeknovy ludeknovy commented Apr 17, 2024

using db with timescale toolkit pre-installed, lttb module was removed and replaced by db function to avoid high memory usage

…d replaced by db function to avoid high memory usage
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.09%. Comparing base (acafc92) to head (83924ca).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...er/controllers/item/shared/item-data-processing.ts 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #320      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   54.03%   54.09%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         102      102              
  Lines        1686     1684       -2     
  Branches      153      153              
==========================================
  Hits          911      911              
+ Misses        768      766       -2     
  Partials        7        7              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 54.09% <0.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@PrasannaKothawade
Copy link

@ludeknovy we are also getting failure when processing large test results with "JavaScript heap out of memory", even with 8Gb heap memory allocation. Can you please get this released?

@ludeknovy
Copy link
Owner Author

Hi @PrasannaKothawade
Well, it has not been fully tested, and migration instructions are not written yet.

But if you fork the project and build a docker image from this branch, you are free to use it.

@PrasannaKothawade
Copy link

Hi @PrasannaKothawade Well, it has not been fully tested, and migration instructions are not written yet.

But if you fork the project and build a docker image from this branch, you are free to use it.

Sure, thank you

@ludeknovy ludeknovy merged commit f8e2e5c into master Sep 11, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@ludeknovy ludeknovy deleted the feature/v5 branch September 11, 2024 10:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants