-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
Mark data volumes as optional #79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for opening this pull request! Be sure to follow the pull request template!
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
I am a bot, here are the test results for this PR:
|
Description:
My understanding is that the two
data
volumes are optional. Thus, I've moved them toopt_param_volumes
.(I guessed that this is the proper handling of optional volumes based on some other examples.)
Benefits of this PR and context:
How Has This Been Tested?
Untested.
Source / References: