-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: support delta merge for IVF_HNSW_SQ #2132
Conversation
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
this is not efficient because it just skipped the IVF & quantization training, the graph will be re-constructed. |
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2132 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 81.15% 81.16% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 186 186
Lines 54163 54521 +358
Branches 54163 54521 +358
==========================================
+ Hits 43954 44250 +296
- Misses 7729 7776 +47
- Partials 2480 2495 +15
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This generally looks good. @BubbleCal when you have time this week, can you rebase the PR? I'm going to need to rebase my work in #2192 on this.
let reader = | ||
RecordBatchIterator::new(vec![record_batch].into_iter().map(Ok), schema.clone()); | ||
dataset.append(reader, None).await.unwrap(); | ||
let mut dataset = DatasetBuilder::from_uri(test_uri).load().await.unwrap(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why reload the dataset here? It's already open, isn't it?
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: BubbleCal <[email protected]>
No description provided.