Release Notes draft for k/k v1.33.0-rc.1 #2765
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
kind/documentation
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
area/release-team
k8s-ci-robot
added
sig/release
|
@sreeram-venkitesh There's a lint issue. Could you please run |
| If you are also using the feature gate `KubeletCrashLoopBackOffMax` with a configured | ||
| per-node `CrashLoopBackOff.MaxContainerRestartPeriod`, the effective kubelet configuration | ||
| will follow the conflict resolution policy described further in the documentation | ||
| [here](TODO:link). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This link has not been updated in the PR yet. We can ping the author about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've updated it in the final release note draft. Don't worry about it.
|
@rayandas The lint issue is from this multiline release note not being wrapped in quotes. Can I update this manually in
|
| @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| ### Deprecation | |||
|
|
|||
| - The EndpointSlice `hints` field has graduated to GA. The beta annotation `service.kubernetes.io/topology-mode` is now considered deprecated and will not graduate to GA. It remains operational for backward compatibility. Users are encouraged to use the `spec.trafficDistribution` field in the Service API for topology-aware routing configuration. ([#130742](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130742), [@gauravkghildiyal](https://github.com/gauravkghildiyal)) [SIG Network] | |||
| - The EndpointSlice `hints` field has graduated to GA. The beta annotation `service.kubernetes.io/topology-mode` is now considered deprecated and will not graduate to GA. It remains operational for backward compatibility. Users are encouraged to use the `spec.trafficDistribution` field in the Service API for topology-aware routing configuration. ([#130742](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130742), [@gauravkghildiyal](https://github.com/gauravkghildiyal)) | |||
| - The `StorageCapacityScoring` feature gate was added to score nodes by available storage capacity. It's in alpha and disabled by default. The `VolumeCapacityPriority` alpha feature was replaced with this, and the default behavior was changed. The `VolumeCapacityPriority` preferred a node with the least allocatable, but the `StorageCapacityScoring` preferred a node with the maximum allocatable. See [KEP-4049](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-storage/4049-storage-capacity-scoring-of-nodes-for-dynamic-provisioning/README.md) for details. ([#128184](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/128184), [@cupnes](https://github.com/cupnes)) [SIG Scheduling, Storage and Testing] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The SIGs are being removed for a lot of notes. Are you using krel latest version? This was a bug in a previous version as I can recall.
@sreeram-venkitesh Yeah update it manually and push it. |
|
@rayandas I've fixed the lint issues with missing punctuations and also added the SIGs back. I had installed the latest version of krel, not sure why the SIGs were removed. |
sreeram-venkitesh
force-pushed
the
release-notes-draft-v1.33.0-rc.1
branch
from
41ed520 to
edd0bcf
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: npolshakova, sreeram-venkitesh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
What type of PR is this:
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
Release notes for v1.33-rc.1
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Special notes for your reviewer: