Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Dynamically Sized Jobs - Scale Down #1852

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Dynamically Sized Jobs - Scale Down #1852

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vicentefb
Copy link
Contributor

@vicentefb vicentefb commented Mar 15, 2024 •
edited by alculquicondor
Loading

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

This includes Phase 1 implementation for Dynamically Sized Jobs KEP #1851

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #77

Special notes for your reviewer:

Scale Down only implementation for RayClusters

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Scale Down implementation for RayClusters

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 15, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 15, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vicentefb. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 15, 2024
@netlify Netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 64edc86
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/667c66c547e9ff0007fc8ebf
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1852--kubernetes-sigs-kueue.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@vicentefb vicentefb force-pushed the ElasticJobs branch 2 times, most recently from f0f98d9 to d49df00 Compare March 15, 2024 02:54
@vicentefb
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @andrewsykim @astefanutti

@vicentefb vicentefb mentioned this pull request Mar 15, 2024
Merged
@vicentefb vicentefb force-pushed the ElasticJobs branch 2 times, most recently from 0bcee5e to daa8d26 Compare March 15, 2024 16:57
@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 15, 2024
andrewsykim
andrewsykim reviewed Mar 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
pkg/controller/core/workload_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/controller/core/workload_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/controller/core/workload_controller.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/scheduler/scheduler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/webhooks/workload_webhook.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 18, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 18, 2024
@vicentefb vicentefb force-pushed the ElasticJobs branch 2 times, most recently from b194b89 to 35ca648 Compare April 5, 2024 21:18
@vicentefb vicentefb changed the title [WIP] Dynamically Sized Jobs - Scale Down Dynamically Sized Jobs - Scale Down Apr 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 28, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 29, 2024
andrewsykim
andrewsykim reviewed May 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
pkg/util/equality/podset.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/util/equality/podset.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/util/equality/podset.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@vicentefb vicentefb force-pushed the ElasticJobs branch 2 times, most recently from b4b7dca to ba0b271 Compare May 30, 2024 22:59
@vicentefb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@vicentefb
Copy link
Contributor Author

friendly ping :) @kerthcet @alculquicondor

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Waiting for the release of 0.7 before merging this

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels May 31, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vicentefb
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign tenzen-y for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Jun 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 14, 2024
@vicentefb vicentefb force-pushed the ElasticJobs branch 2 times, most recently from 698cd3b to 1ed17a7 Compare June 17, 2024 18:49
@vicentefb
scale down
64edc86 
n

m

patch error field not declared in schema

commented out podSet immutability from workload webhook to be able to update that field

added more comments

clean code

nit

debuggin

n

m

patch error field not declared in schema

clean code

n

m

patch error field not declared in schema

commented out podSet immutability from workload webhook to be able to update that field

added more comments

clean code

nit

a

cluster queue reconciliation fixed, it had to do with the infot totalrequests from admission
inside the worklad go file

working with scheduler

cleaning code

cleaning code

cleaning

cleaning

cleaning

integation test, but it messes up with parallelism test which should be expected

updated parallelism it test

updated wrappers

kep

removed Kep

removed log lines

clean code

added a better conditional for updating the resize if the job is a RayCluster

added Kind condition

updated test and equivalentToWorkload condition

added podset assigments check

updated feature gate

updated feature gate

updating equivalentWorkload

fixed lint

removed changes from scheduler and workload controller

testing

updated workload controller reconciler to update spec and status

nit

update feature gate

update variables

made code more generic

updated workload controller helper method

typo

nit

addressed comments

updated workload controller to use unuused quota

updated integration test to work

added unit test in workload controller

changed naming to resizeable and fixed lint

nit

addressed comments

addressed comments

lint

nit

addressed comments

nit

nit

nit
@vicentefb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 20, 2024
@akram
Copy link

akram commented Oct 13, 2024

any update about this PR ?
It was looking as a good start

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

This needs a contributor to pick up the work and complete the scale up design and implementation.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@vicentefb: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-30 64edc86 link true /test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-30
pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-31 64edc86 link true /test pull-kueue-test-e2e-main-1-31
pull-kueue-test-tas-e2e-main 64edc86 link true /test pull-kueue-test-tas-e2e-main

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@denkensk denkensk Awaiting requested review from denkensk

@kerthcet kerthcet Awaiting requested review from kerthcet

@alculquicondor alculquicondor Awaiting requested review from alculquicondor

@andrewsykim andrewsykim Awaiting requested review from andrewsykim

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@vicentefb @k8s-ci-robot @tenzen-y @kerthcet @alculquicondor @akram @andrewsykim