Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: When creating a list of files and images with ./generate_list.sh, included ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen image in the list. #11708

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DearJey
Copy link

@DearJey DearJey commented Nov 13, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

When list of files, images and local repogitry was created with ./generate_list.sh, ./manage-offline-files.sh and createing Kubernetes Cluster In offline construction with ingress_nginx_webhook_enabled: true, ingress-nginx-admission-* Pod of the Job created when is ImagePullBackOff and does not become READY.

  • kubectl describe po -n ingress-nginx ingress-nginx-admission-*
Events:
  Type     Reason     Age                  From               Message
  ----     ------     ----                 ----               -------
  Normal   Scheduled  2m16s                default-scheduler  Successfully assigned ingress-nginx/ingress-nginx-admission-patch-5hcxf to worker2
  Normal   Pulling    53s (x4 over 2m16s)  kubelet            Pulling image "192.168.122.155:5000/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1"
  Warning  Failed     53s (x4 over 2m16s)  kubelet            Failed to pull image "192.168.122.155:5000/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1": rpc error: code = NotFound desc = failed to pull and unpack image "192.168.122.155:5000/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1": failed to resolve reference "192.168.122.155:5000/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1": 192.168.122.155:5000/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1: not found
  Warning  Failed     53s (x4 over 2m16s)  kubelet            Error: ErrImagePull
  Warning  Failed     38s (x6 over 2m16s)  kubelet            Error: ImagePullBackOff
  Normal   BackOff    23s (x7 over 2m16s)  kubelet            Back-off pulling image "192.168.122.155:5000/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1"

./generate_list.sh creates an image list based on the downloads: section of /roles/kubespray-defaults/defaults/main/download.yml.

#!/bin/bash
set -eo pipefail

CURRENT_DIR=$(cd $(dirname $0); pwd)
TEMP_DIR="${CURRENT_DIR}/temp"
REPO_ROOT_DIR="${CURRENT_DIR%/contrib/offline}"

: ${DOWNLOAD_YML:="roles/kubespray-defaults/defaults/main/download.yml"}

mkdir -p ${TEMP_DIR}

# generate all download files url template
grep 'download_url:' ${REPO_ROOT_DIR}/${DOWNLOAD_YML} \
    | sed 's/^.*_url: //g;s/\"//g' > ${TEMP_DIR}/files.list.template

# generate all images list template
sed -n '/^downloads:/,/download_defaults:/p' ${REPO_ROOT_DIR}/${DOWNLOAD_YML} \
    | sed -n "s/repo: //p;s/tag: //p" | tr -d ' ' \
    | sed 'N;s#\n# #g' | tr ' ' ':' | sed 's/\"//g' > ${TEMP_DIR}/images.list.template

So, add the following to download.yml, registry.k8s.io/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1 was added to the image list, and the above phenomenon was resolved.

  • vi /root/k8s-upgrade/kubespray-2.25.0/roles/kubespray-defaults/defaults/main/download.yml
downloads:
  ingress_nginx_kube_webhook_certgen:
    repo: "{{ ingress_nginx_kube_webhook_certgen_image_repo }}"
    tag: "{{ ingress_nginx_kube_webhook_certgen_image_tag }}"
    sha256: "{{ ingress_nginx_kube_webhook_certgen_digest_checksum | default(None) }}"
    groups:
      - kube_node
    when: ingress_nginx_webhook_enabled

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #11591

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Fix: When creating a list of files and images with ./generate_list.sh, `ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.4.1` is also included in the list.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. labels Nov 13, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Nov 13, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: DearJey / name: Jay.H (43587f3)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 13, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DearJey
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign liupeng0518 for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @DearJey!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubespray 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubespray has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 13, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @DearJey. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 13, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 18, 2024
@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented Nov 18, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
3 participants