Fix PSS restricted warnings

[akagami-harsh]

Description of your changes:
related to kubeflow/manifests#3050

Checklist:

• You have signed off your commits
• The title for your pull request (PR) should follow our title convention. Learn more about the pull request title convention used in this repository.

[google-oss-prow]

Hi @akagami-harsh. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zijianjoy for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• manifests/kustomize/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[juliusvonkohout]

/lgtm
/hold

for @hbelmiro and @HumairAK

[hbelmiro]

Why are you adding it to spec.template.spec.containers here while in the other files, you moved from spec.template.spec.containers to spec.template.spec?

[akagami-harsh]

It is indeed under spec.template.spec, it is not inside containers; it is just placed below containers

[akagami-harsh]

i'll add it above to avoid confusion.

[hbelmiro]

/ok-to-test

[hbelmiro]

/lgtm
/unhold

[juliusvonkohout]

/lgtm /unhold

Yes, I also think that it is good enough for merging. We just need an approval @HumairAK

[nithin8702]

This PR has good no of best practices. Will this be included in 1.10 release?

[juliusvonkohout]

This PR has good no of best practices. Will this be included in 1.10 release?

If the maintainers of KFP here approve it I can apply it as hotfix. But maybe is slips into 1.10.1.