Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Set worker count to 10 everywhere #2699

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

ncdc
Copy link
Member

@ncdc ncdc commented Jan 27, 2023

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 27, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 27, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: stevekuznetsov

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 27, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 27, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 27, 2023

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@ncdc ncdc force-pushed the consistent-controller-workers branch 2 times, most recently from 7356e88 to ffc56b2 Compare February 2, 2023 20:00
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ func TestServerWithClientCAFile(clientCAFile string) []string {
// start a test server with the given token auth file.
func TestServerArgsWithTokenAuthFile(tokenAuthFile string) []string {
return []string{
"-v=4",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is undesired, isn't it?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's for debugging the failures

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for debugging sure, but to merge? We already went from 2 to 4 sometime ago. Now 5?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not to merge, no

@ncdc
Copy link
Member Author

ncdc commented Feb 3, 2023

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 3, 2023
@ncdc
Copy link
Member Author

ncdc commented Feb 10, 2023

/retest

1 similar comment
@ncdc
Copy link
Member Author

ncdc commented Feb 13, 2023

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 20, 2023
@ncdc ncdc force-pushed the consistent-controller-workers branch from ffc56b2 to 3290979 Compare March 7, 2023 21:59
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 7, 2023
ncdc added 2 commits March 7, 2023 17:36
Signed-off-by: Andy Goldstein <[email protected]>
@ncdc ncdc force-pushed the consistent-controller-workers branch from 3290979 to ec68ca8 Compare March 7, 2023 22:36
ncdc added 3 commits March 8, 2023 12:27
Skip deleting bound resources in the logicalcluster deletor as this can
race with the apibinding deletion controller. If the apibinding deletion
controller deletes an APIBinding and all its instances and then the
logicalcluster deletor tries to delete the collection of the same
resources (because it saw the resource in discovery), it will get a 404
and go into rate limited backoff, which we don't want.

Signed-off-by: Andy Goldstein <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 8, 2023

@ncdc: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-shared 839a11d link true /test e2e-shared
ci/prow/e2e-sharded 839a11d link true /test e2e-sharded

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 25, 2023
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

@ncdc I assume we still want this?

@ncdc
Copy link
Member Author

ncdc commented Mar 27, 2023

Yes, I think so. I still haven't figured out why this consistently causes content deletion to fail/flake.

@ncdc
Copy link
Member Author

ncdc commented May 19, 2023

Replaced by #2960
/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this May 19, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 19, 2023

@ncdc: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Replaced by #2960
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants