feat(model): particle in a box #44
Conversation
Define basic components
| self.finite_box = FiniteBox.model_validate(finite_box) | ||
| self.quantum_particle = QuantumParticle.model_validate(quantum_particle) | ||
|
|
||
| def __call__(self) -> pd.DataFrame: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Having a brain fart, wondering what should be the variables here. Should it be the box size or particle energy or both?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If I were to write the code now, I would just input
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So the
GrumpySapiens
added
documentation
| from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, computed_field, field_validator | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| PLANCK_CONST = 6.626e-34 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/constants.html#physical-constants
Alternatively we may let the use decide the unit. Tiny numbers can become impractical.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, too small numbers could be impractical. Another option is not to use planck constant explicitly. Or do planck related calculations at the very end.
|
|
||
|
|
||
| PLANCK_CONST = 6.626e-34 | ||
| PI = 3.142 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| :cvar p_height: potential well height | ||
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| length: float = Field(ge=0) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ge=0.0 for being a float.
Also the length you defined here is actually half-width. It may become tricky at some point..
| class QuantumParticle(BaseModel): | ||
| r"""Definition of the quantum particle | ||
|
|
||
| :cvar energy: energy of the particle |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Need to set the ground energy, which is a quantity that the particle becomes unbounded at finite possibility. Something like this.
| r"""Definition of the quantum particle | ||
|
|
||
| :cvar energy: energy of the particle | ||
| :cvar mass: weight of the particle |
| class WaveFunctionConst(BaseModel): | ||
| r"""Schrodinger equation simplification terms""" | ||
|
|
||
| @property |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Preferably cached_property or some kinds of computed field? @emptymalei
We also have hbar in https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/constants.html#physical-constants
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Preferably
cached_propertyor some kinds of computed field? @emptymaleiWe also have
hbarin https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/constants.html#physical-constants
+1
- To serialize the properties properly in Pydantic, we need
computed_field. - Also better to cache it as this is used n-time-step times.
| self.finite_box = FiniteBox.model_validate(finite_box) | ||
| self.quantum_particle = QuantumParticle.model_validate(quantum_particle) | ||
|
|
||
| def __call__(self) -> pd.DataFrame: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If I were to write the code now, I would just input
particle_in_box.py