-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
517c366
commit 4d77300
Showing
35 changed files
with
173 additions
and
696 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
首先,下载chatpaper整个项目后,打开项目时,单独打开ChatReviewerAndResponse这个文件夹。 | ||
|
||
因为这两个项目互相独立,如果打开的是chatpaper文件夹,会导致路径不对! |
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
134 changes: 67 additions & 67 deletions
134
review_comments.txt → ChatReviewerAndResponse/review_comments.txt
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,68 +1,68 @@ | ||
#1 Reviewer | ||
Overall Review: | ||
The paper proposes a novel Coarse-to-fine Cascaded Evidence-Distillation (CofCED) neural network for explainable fake news detection. The proposed model selects the most explainable sentences for verdicts based on raw reports, thereby reducing the dependency on fact-checked reports. The paper presents two explainable fake news datasets and experimental results demonstrating that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art detection baselines and generates high-quality explanations. | ||
Paper Strength: | ||
(1) The paper addresses an important and timely problem of fake news detection and provide insights into the limitations of existing methods. | ||
(2) The proposed CofCED model is innovative and utilizes a hierarchical encoder and cascaded selectors for selecting explainable sentences. | ||
(3) The paper contributes to the research community by presenting two publicly available datasets for explainable fake news detection. | ||
Paper Weakness: | ||
(1) The paper could benefit from more detailed clarification of the proposed model's architecture and implementation details. | ||
(2) The paper lacks comparison with more relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field. | ||
(3) Although the paper constructs two explainable fake news datasets, the paper does not describe the process and criteria for creating them. | ||
Questions To Authors And Suggestions For Rebuttal: | ||
(1) Can the authors provide additional information on the proposed model's architecture and implementation details? | ||
(2) Can the authors compare their proposed method with additional relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field? | ||
(3) Can the authors provide more details on the process and criteria for creating the two constructed explainable fake news datasets? | ||
Overall score (1-5): 4 | ||
The paper provides an innovative approach to fake news detection using a cascade of selectors and presents two publicly available datasets for the research community. However, the paper could benefit from additional details on architectural and implementation details and comparisons with more relevant baselines. | ||
#2 Reviewer | ||
Overall Review: | ||
The paper proposes a novel Coarse-to-fine Cascaded Evidence-Distillation (CofCED) neural network for explainable fake news detection. The proposed model selects the most explainable sentences for verdicts based on raw reports, thereby reducing the dependency on fact-checked reports. The paper presents two explainable fake news datasets and experimental results demonstrating that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art detection baselines and generates high-quality explanations. | ||
Paper Strength: | ||
(1) The paper addresses an important and timely problem of fake news detection and provide insights into the limitations of existing methods. | ||
(2) The proposed CofCED model is innovative and utilizes a hierarchical encoder and cascaded selectors for selecting explainable sentences. | ||
(3) The paper contributes to the research community by presenting two publicly available datasets for explainable fake news detection. | ||
Paper Weakness: | ||
(1) The paper could benefit from more detailed clarification of the proposed model's architecture and implementation details. | ||
(2) The paper lacks comparison with more relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field. | ||
(3) Although the paper constructs two explainable fake news datasets, the paper does not describe the process and criteria for creating them. | ||
Questions To Authors And Suggestions For Rebuttal: | ||
(1) Can the authors provide additional information on the proposed model's architecture and implementation details? | ||
(2) Can the authors compare their proposed method with additional relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field? | ||
(3) Can the authors provide more details on the process and criteria for creating the two constructed explainable fake news datasets? | ||
Overall score (1-5): 4 | ||
The paper provides an innovative approach to fake news detection using a cascade of selectors and presents two publicly available datasets for the research community. However, the paper could benefit from additional details on architectural and implementation details and comparisons with more relevant baselines. | ||
#3 Reviewer | ||
Overall Review: | ||
The paper proposes a novel Coarse-to-fine Cascaded Evidence-Distillation (CofCED) neural network for explainable fake news detection. The proposed model selects the most explainable sentences for verdicts based on raw reports, thereby reducing the dependency on fact-checked reports. The paper presents two explainable fake news datasets and experimental results demonstrating that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art detection baselines and generates high-quality explanations. | ||
Paper Strength: | ||
(1) The paper addresses an important and timely problem of fake news detection and provide insights into the limitations of existing methods. | ||
(2) The proposed CofCED model is innovative and utilizes a hierarchical encoder and cascaded selectors for selecting explainable sentences. | ||
(3) The paper contributes to the research community by presenting two publicly available datasets for explainable fake news detection. | ||
Paper Weakness: | ||
(1) The paper could benefit from more detailed clarification of the proposed model's architecture and implementation details. | ||
(2) The paper lacks comparison with more relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field. | ||
(3) Although the paper constructs two explainable fake news datasets, the paper does not describe the process and criteria for creating them. | ||
Questions To Authors And Suggestions For Rebuttal: | ||
(1) Can the authors provide additional information on the proposed model's architecture and implementation details? | ||
(2) Can the authors compare their proposed method with additional relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field? | ||
(3) Can the authors provide more details on the process and criteria for creating the two constructed explainable fake news datasets? | ||
Overall score (1-5): 4 | ||
#1 Reviewer | ||
|
||
Overall Review: | ||
The paper proposes a novel Coarse-to-fine Cascaded Evidence-Distillation (CofCED) neural network for explainable fake news detection. The proposed model selects the most explainable sentences for verdicts based on raw reports, thereby reducing the dependency on fact-checked reports. The paper presents two explainable fake news datasets and experimental results demonstrating that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art detection baselines and generates high-quality explanations. | ||
|
||
Paper Strength: | ||
(1) The paper addresses an important and timely problem of fake news detection and provide insights into the limitations of existing methods. | ||
(2) The proposed CofCED model is innovative and utilizes a hierarchical encoder and cascaded selectors for selecting explainable sentences. | ||
(3) The paper contributes to the research community by presenting two publicly available datasets for explainable fake news detection. | ||
|
||
Paper Weakness: | ||
(1) The paper could benefit from more detailed clarification of the proposed model's architecture and implementation details. | ||
(2) The paper lacks comparison with more relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field. | ||
(3) Although the paper constructs two explainable fake news datasets, the paper does not describe the process and criteria for creating them. | ||
|
||
Questions To Authors And Suggestions For Rebuttal: | ||
(1) Can the authors provide additional information on the proposed model's architecture and implementation details? | ||
(2) Can the authors compare their proposed method with additional relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field? | ||
(3) Can the authors provide more details on the process and criteria for creating the two constructed explainable fake news datasets? | ||
|
||
Overall score (1-5): 4 | ||
The paper provides an innovative approach to fake news detection using a cascade of selectors and presents two publicly available datasets for the research community. However, the paper could benefit from additional details on architectural and implementation details and comparisons with more relevant baselines. | ||
|
||
#2 Reviewer | ||
|
||
Overall Review: | ||
The paper proposes a novel Coarse-to-fine Cascaded Evidence-Distillation (CofCED) neural network for explainable fake news detection. The proposed model selects the most explainable sentences for verdicts based on raw reports, thereby reducing the dependency on fact-checked reports. The paper presents two explainable fake news datasets and experimental results demonstrating that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art detection baselines and generates high-quality explanations. | ||
|
||
Paper Strength: | ||
(1) The paper addresses an important and timely problem of fake news detection and provide insights into the limitations of existing methods. | ||
(2) The proposed CofCED model is innovative and utilizes a hierarchical encoder and cascaded selectors for selecting explainable sentences. | ||
(3) The paper contributes to the research community by presenting two publicly available datasets for explainable fake news detection. | ||
|
||
Paper Weakness: | ||
(1) The paper could benefit from more detailed clarification of the proposed model's architecture and implementation details. | ||
(2) The paper lacks comparison with more relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field. | ||
(3) Although the paper constructs two explainable fake news datasets, the paper does not describe the process and criteria for creating them. | ||
|
||
Questions To Authors And Suggestions For Rebuttal: | ||
(1) Can the authors provide additional information on the proposed model's architecture and implementation details? | ||
(2) Can the authors compare their proposed method with additional relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field? | ||
(3) Can the authors provide more details on the process and criteria for creating the two constructed explainable fake news datasets? | ||
|
||
Overall score (1-5): 4 | ||
The paper provides an innovative approach to fake news detection using a cascade of selectors and presents two publicly available datasets for the research community. However, the paper could benefit from additional details on architectural and implementation details and comparisons with more relevant baselines. | ||
|
||
#3 Reviewer | ||
|
||
Overall Review: | ||
The paper proposes a novel Coarse-to-fine Cascaded Evidence-Distillation (CofCED) neural network for explainable fake news detection. The proposed model selects the most explainable sentences for verdicts based on raw reports, thereby reducing the dependency on fact-checked reports. The paper presents two explainable fake news datasets and experimental results demonstrating that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art detection baselines and generates high-quality explanations. | ||
|
||
Paper Strength: | ||
(1) The paper addresses an important and timely problem of fake news detection and provide insights into the limitations of existing methods. | ||
(2) The proposed CofCED model is innovative and utilizes a hierarchical encoder and cascaded selectors for selecting explainable sentences. | ||
(3) The paper contributes to the research community by presenting two publicly available datasets for explainable fake news detection. | ||
|
||
Paper Weakness: | ||
(1) The paper could benefit from more detailed clarification of the proposed model's architecture and implementation details. | ||
(2) The paper lacks comparison with more relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field. | ||
(3) Although the paper constructs two explainable fake news datasets, the paper does not describe the process and criteria for creating them. | ||
|
||
Questions To Authors And Suggestions For Rebuttal: | ||
(1) Can the authors provide additional information on the proposed model's architecture and implementation details? | ||
(2) Can the authors compare their proposed method with additional relevant and widely-used baseline methods in the field? | ||
(3) Can the authors provide more details on the process and criteria for creating the two constructed explainable fake news datasets? | ||
|
||
Overall score (1-5): 4 | ||
The paper provides an innovative approach to fake news detection using a cascade of selectors and presents two publicly available datasets for the research community. However, the paper could benefit from additional details on architectural and implementation details and comparisons with more relevant baselines. |
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
和docker的配置类似,现在的版本,基本上就是一个python文件,用huggingface的必要性没那么高 | ||
|
||
需要的话,可以直接使用我们的网站,chatwithpaper.org,效果类似。 |
File renamed without changes.
Oops, something went wrong.