Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

results of gene detection with the doublepass option #917

Open
rubmc97 opened this issue Dec 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

results of gene detection with the doublepass option #917

rubmc97 opened this issue Dec 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@rubmc97
Copy link

rubmc97 commented Dec 26, 2024

Hi,

So I ran SqueezeMeta to analyse several metagenomes and to retrieve ARGs, including the doublepass option (--D). I was wondering if for the downstream analyses of the ARGs I should consider only the ORFs detected with blastx (blastx as method on table 13) or both (the ones which contain either prodigal or blastx in method in the output table 13)? I went through the instructions .pdf but I'm not entirely sure on how to proceed.

Many thanks,
Ruben Martinez

@fpusan
Copy link
Collaborator

fpusan commented Jan 6, 2025

Hi,
You should in principle use both. Blastx may catch some extra genes that were not predicted by prodigal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants