Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove 'Disable project' button from project view #9202

Merged
merged 5 commits into from May 10, 2024

Conversation

janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor

@janfaracik janfaracik commented Apr 27, 2024

Discussed briefly in the last UX Sig, the 'Disable project' (and 'Add/edit description') button take up a lot of vertical space (roughly 100px) and this forces useful information, such as stage view plugin etc down.

My proposal would be just to remove the 'Disable project' button altogether and instead have users rely on the configure screen to disable projects.

Before
image

After
image

Testing done

  • Disable button has been removed, still possible to reenable a project from that view however

Proposed changelog entries

  • Remove 'Disable project' button from project view.

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Submitter checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
    Options
  2. The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
    Options
  3. There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
    Options
  4. New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
    Options
  5. New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
    Options
  6. New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
    Options
  7. For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
    Options
  8. For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.
    Options

Desired reviewers

@jenkinsci/sig-ux

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

Edit tasklist title
Beta Give feedback Tasklist Maintainer checklist, more options

Delete tasklist

Delete tasklist block?
Are you sure? All relationships in this tasklist will be removed.
  1. There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
    Options
  2. Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
    Options
  3. Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
    Options
  4. Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
    Options
  5. If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
    Options
  6. If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).
    Options

@timja timja added the rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted label Apr 27, 2024
Copy link
Member

@uhafner uhafner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I never used that button on my own, but wouldn't it make sense to remove it when we move all those actions to the action bar?

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Apr 27, 2024

I never used that button on my own, but wouldn't it make sense to remove it when we move all those actions to the action bar?

This button is also on the configure page so its just duplicated so I think its a special case.

@daniel-beck
Copy link
Member

Isn't this a good use case for app-bar buttons?

@janfaracik
Copy link
Contributor Author

I never used that button on my own, but wouldn't it make sense to remove it when we move all those actions to the action bar?

Isn't this a good use case for app-bar buttons?

I agree with Tim here, this is a duplicated button that isn't very often used for how prominent it is. Demoed an app bar rework for the project page in the latest UX meeting in which it could live, but not sure how useful it would be to have there.

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented May 8, 2024

/label ready-for-merge


This PR is now ready for merge, after ~24 hours, we will merge it if there's no negative feedback.

Thanks!

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback label May 8, 2024
@MarkEWaite MarkEWaite merged commit 57d6464 into jenkinsci:master May 10, 2024
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-merge The PR is ready to go, and it will be merged soon if there is no negative feedback rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted
Projects
None yet
6 participants