relicense non source code parts to CC-BY 4.0

[japaric]

the source code parts are still dual licensed under the MIT/Apache-2.0
licenses

---

Hey all,

I'd like to relicense the non source code parts (the "documentation") of this
repository under the CC-BY 4.0 license as, I understand it, it's a better
license for "prose".

The source code will remain dual licensed under MIT/Apache-2.0.

If you are okay with CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 licensing, can you reply on this
ticket with:

I license past and future contributions under the triple CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose the license at their option.

Thanks, and sorry for making you do this.

cc:

• @Tiwalun
• @cwoodall
• @dzamlo
• @jamesmunns
• @jedireza
• @limeburst

[jedireza]

I license past and future contributions under the triple CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose the license at their option.

[jamesmunns]

I license past and future contributions under the triple CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose the license at their option.

[limeburst]

I license past and future contributions under the triple CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose the license at their option.

On Nov 16, 2016, at 12:58 AM, Jorge Aparicio [email protected] wrote:

the source code parts are still dual licensed under the MIT/Apache-2.0
licenses

Hey all,

I'd like to relicense the non source code parts (the "documentation") of this
repository under the CC-BY 4.0 license as, I understand it, it's a better
license for "prose".

The source code will remain dual licensed under MIT/Apache-2.0.

If you are okay with CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 licensing, can you reply on this
ticket with:

I license past and future contributions under the triple CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose the license at their option.

Thanks, and sorry for making you do this.

cc:

@Tiwalun
@cwoodall
@dzamlo
@jamesmunns
@jedireza
@limeburst
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#44

Commit Summary

relicense non source code parts to CC-BY 4.0
File Changes

A LICENSE-CC-BY (395)
M README.md (12)
Patch Links:

https://github.com/japaric/copper/pull/44.patch
https://github.com/japaric/copper/pull/44.diff
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[japaric]

ping @Tiwalun @cwoodall @dzamlo (see PR description) 😄

[Tiwalun]

I license past and future contributions under the triple CC-BY/MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to chose the license at their option. 2016-12-14 21:22 GMT+01:00 Jorge Aparicio <[email protected]>:

…

ping @Tiwalun <https://github.com/Tiwalun> @cwoodall <https://github.com/cwoodall> @dzamlo <https://github.com/dzamlo> (see PR description) 😄 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#44 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA0do-JD0W9s9GvBNieJ76gzCjjWPgknks5rIE_tgaJpZM4KysZ6> .