-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rework the metrics used by the FileTree #161
Draft
Pennycook
wants to merge
18
commits into
intel:main
Choose a base branch
from
Pennycook:metric-rework
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Presenting the amount of code used by all platforms as "coverage" is more aligned with how we describe CBI's functionality elsewhere. Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Small refactoring to enable later re-use. Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
This has several advantages: - It wastes less whitespace than printing two SLOC counts. - The reader doesn't have to perform division to calculate coverage. - We can easily color-code coverage to highlight good/bad values. Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Pennycook
added
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
ux
Issues and PRs pertaining to user experience
labels
Jan 28, 2025
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Computing coverage relative to a set of platforms enables the function to be used in more contexts. Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
- Mention "platform coverage" in README and home page. - Add a description of "platform coverage" to the specialization page. Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Pennycook
force-pushed
the
metric-rework
branch
from
January 28, 2025 12:13
43fe59c
to
ca90a0d
Compare
Signed-off-by: John Pennycook <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
ux
Issues and PRs pertaining to user experience
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related issues
Proposed changes
FileTree
output by focusing in "coverage" metrics and removing redundant information.The new report output is much more readable than the old one:
I've opened this as a draft to ensure that we don't accidentally merge it before #158, but I think the functionality is ready for review.