Fixing lint errors in concepts including hooks

[ivanleomk]

This introduces a PR that fixes some linting errors we had in the concepts docs

---

Important

Fix lint errors and improve code examples in hooks.md and multimodal.md for better clarity and correctness.

• Code Examples:
  • Update example output in hooks.md to Hello, world!.
  • Add try-except block in hooks.md for error handling during completion creation.
  • Update log_completion_kwargs and log_completion_response functions in hooks.md to improve logging clarity.
  • Add ImageAnalyzer class in multimodal.md for structured response handling.
  • Update image handling example in multimodal.md to use a real image URL and save it locally.
• Formatting:
  • Add hidden code sections in hooks.md and multimodal.md to improve example clarity.
  • Adjust JSON response formatting in multimodal.md for better readability.

^{This description was created by for 0bd7b30. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 0bd7b30 in 24 seconds

More details

• Looked at 419 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 10 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. docs/concepts/hooks.md:152

• Draft comment:
  The function signature for log_completion_kwargs should match the documentation. Consider changing it to:

def log_completion_kwargs(*args, **kwargs) -> None:

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The function signature for log_completion_kwargs in the example does not match the one described in the documentation. The example uses kwargs as a single argument, while the documentation uses *args, **kwargs. This inconsistency should be addressed for clarity and correctness.

2. docs/concepts/hooks.md:188

• Draft comment:
  Ensure response.model_dump() is a valid method. If not, consider using:

print(response.dict())

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The log_completion_response function uses response.model_dump() which is not a standard method for dumping models. It should be checked if this is a custom method or if it should be replaced with a standard method like response.dict() or response.json().

3. docs/concepts/hooks.md:238

• Draft comment:
  Remove the unnecessary comment line:

print(error)

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The log_parse_error function has a commented line #> ## Parse error: which seems unnecessary and should be removed for clarity.

4. docs/concepts/hooks.md:284

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding more context to the error message:

print(f"An error occurred: {type(e).__name__}: {e}")

• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The try-except block is used to catch exceptions, but the error message is printed without any context. It would be more informative to include the type of exception or a custom message.

5. docs/concepts/hooks.md:152

• Draft comment:
  The parameter kwargs in log_completion_kwargs function is not descriptive enough. Consider using a more descriptive name to indicate what kind of kwargs it is handling.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The log_completion_kwargs function in hooks.md has a parameter kwargs which is not descriptive enough. It should be more descriptive to indicate what kind of kwargs it is handling.

6. docs/concepts/hooks.md:186

• Draft comment:
  The parameter response in log_completion_response function is not descriptive enough. Consider using a more descriptive name to indicate what kind of response it is handling.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The log_completion_response function in hooks.md has a parameter response which is not descriptive enough. It should be more descriptive to indicate what kind of response it is handling.

7. docs/concepts/hooks.md:231

• Draft comment:
  The parameter error in log_completion_error function is not descriptive enough. Consider using a more descriptive name to indicate what kind of error it is handling.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The log_completion_error function in hooks.md has a parameter error which is not descriptive enough. It should be more descriptive to indicate what kind of error it is handling.

8. docs/concepts/hooks.md:236

• Draft comment:
  The parameter error in log_parse_error function is not descriptive enough. Consider using a more descriptive name to indicate what kind of error it is handling.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The log_parse_error function in hooks.md has a parameter error which is not descriptive enough. It should be more descriptive to indicate what kind of error it is handling.

9. docs/concepts/hooks.md:287

• Draft comment:
  The user variable is being used twice in the same context. Consider removing or refactoring the second instance to adhere to the DRY principle.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The user variable is being used twice in the same context, which violates the DRY principle. The second instance should be removed or refactored.

10. docs/concepts/multimodal.md:40

• Draft comment:
  The variables image1 and image2 are not descriptive enough. Consider using more descriptive names to indicate what kind of images they are handling.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 80%
  The image1 and image2 variables in multimodal.md are not descriptive enough. They should be more descriptive to indicate what kind of images they are handling.

Workflow ID: wflow_ndilk8V0jmqhdsQB

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.