Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BACKPORT] Upgrade ruby version from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4 for omnibus-overrides #6779

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: inspec-5
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[BACKPORT] Upgrade ruby version from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4 for omnibus-overrides #6779

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ahasunos
Copy link
Contributor

@ahasunos ahasunos commented Oct 10, 2023 •
edited

Description

This PR backports #6777 to inspec-5

Related Issue

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New content (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (a content change which would break existing functionality or processes)

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.

@ahasunos ahasunos self-assigned this Oct 10, 2023
@ahasunos ahasunos requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2023 07:10
@ahasunos ahasunos requested review from clintoncwolfe and Nik08 and removed request for a team October 10, 2023 07:10
@clintoncwolfe clintoncwolfe added Expeditor: Skip Version Bump dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Do Not Merge labels Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@clintoncwolfe clintoncwolfe clintoncwolfe approved these changes

@Nik08 Nik08 Awaiting requested review from Nik08 Nik08 is a code owner automatically assigned from inspec/inspec-core-team

Assignees

@ahasunos ahasunos

Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file Do Not Merge Expeditor: Skip Version Bump inspec-5
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@ahasunos @clintoncwolfe