Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DNS Host Support for Ansible in v2 #72

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

AnilGadiyarHJ
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@AnilGadiyarHJ AnilGadiyarHJ requested a review from unasra January 31, 2025 09:08
@AnilGadiyarHJ AnilGadiyarHJ requested a review from unasra February 3, 2025 07:09
@AnilGadiyarHJ AnilGadiyarHJ requested a review from unasra February 4, 2025 11:47
@AnilGadiyarHJ AnilGadiyarHJ requested a review from unasra February 5, 2025 08:56
that:
- dns_host_info.objects | length == 1
- dns_host_info.objects[0].id == dns_host.id

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Task for retrieval via tag filters is missing !

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@AnilGadiyarHJ AnilGadiyarHJ Feb 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dns host tags support is greyed out on CSP, but from dns service page we can add tags to dns_host, but they are not retrievable.
when I tried from postman, we could not see the tags being part of the payload

@AnilGadiyarHJ AnilGadiyarHJ requested a review from unasra February 5, 2025 13:14
@unasra unasra requested a review from mathewab February 5, 2025 17:43
Comment on lines +45 to +54
tag_filters:
description:
- Filter dict to filter objects by tags
type: dict
required: false
tag_filter_query:
description:
- Filter query to filter objects by tags
type: str
required: false
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I saw that you commented elsewhere that this doesn't work. it should be removed in that case

@mathewab
Copy link
Collaborator

mathewab commented Feb 5, 2025

Overall LGTM. PR should have been recreated in the new repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants