Fixed crucial bug in dataset.py that resulted in wrong label information #384
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…pixel-scale and grid-scale coordinates. This is resulting in very small IOU values for the middle and large grid scale, preventing a training signal for this part of the network. This does may also explain the poorer training performance compared to the original implementation, because 2/3 of the network is not getting a training signal. I fixed the bug simply by dividing the anchor boxes by the strides for calculating the IOU consistently with grid-level coordinaes. The result looks correct now.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For generating label data for e.g. training the network, the COCO label information are translated into YOLO grid cell labels. Doing this, an IOU score was calculated wrongly, mixing up pixel-scale and grid-scale coordinates in dataset.py.
This is resulting in very small IOU values for the middle and large grid scale, preventing a training signal for this part of the network. This does may also explain the poorer training performance compared to the original implementation, because 2/3 of the network is not getting a training signal. I fixed the bug simply by dividing the anchor boxes by the strides. Doing this, the IOU is calculated consistently with grid-level coordinates. The resulting target for training the network looks correct now.