Merge pull request #102 from jjyaoao/jjy1

Minor update to unit 4

chapters/en/chapter4/classification_models.mdx

@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ and verify this is correct:
 ```
 from IPython.display import Audio
 
+classifier(sample["audio"].copy())
 Audio(sample["audio"]["array"], rate=sample["audio"]["sampling_rate"])
 ```
 
@@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ take that as our prediction. Let's confirm whether we were right by listening to
 volume too high or else you might get a jump!):
 
 ```python
-Audio(audio, rate=16000)
+Audio(audio_sample, rate=16000)
 ```
 
 Perfect! We have the sound of a dog barking 🐕, which aligns with the model's prediction. Have a play with different audio

chapters/en/chapter4/fine-tuning.mdx

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ GTZAN doesn't provide a predefined validation set, so we'll have to create one o
 genres, so we can use the `train_test_split()` method to quickly create a 90/10 split as follows:
 
 ```python
-gtzan = gtzan["train"].train_test_split(seed=42, shuffle=True, test_size=0.1)
+gtzan = gtzan.train_test_split(seed=42, shuffle=True, test_size=0.1)
 gtzan
 ```
 
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ This label looks correct, since it matches the filename of the audio file. Let's
 using Gradio to create a simple interface with the `Blocks` API:
 
 ```python
+import gradio as gr
+
+
 def generate_audio():
  example = gtzan["train"].shuffle()[0]
  audio = example["audio"]