Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Up Vivid cpu freq table to 1512000 #1

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: jellybean
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

homeslice976
Copy link

By default, the Vivid variant of the Holiday is capped at 1.2ghz, while the Raider and the Velocity are capped at 1.5ghz. This bumps the table that is used by the Vivid to 1.5ghz (copied from the _nom table)

@h8rift
Copy link
Member

h8rift commented Jan 31, 2013

Thanks homeslice, we may have to make adjustments to it so this only occurs
on holiday (ifdefs or what not). But thanks for the work on thisbtonget the
correct clock and UV settings :-)
On Jan 31, 2013 9:15 AM, "homeslice976" [email protected] wrote:

By default, the Vivid variant of the Holiday is capped at 1.2ghz, while
the Raider and the Velocity are capped at 1.5ghz. This bumps the table that

is used by the Vivid to 1.5ghz (copied from the _nom table)

You can merge this Pull Request by running

git pull https://github.com/homeslice976/android_kernel_htc_msm8660 newbranch

Or view, comment on, or merge it at:

#1
Commit Summary

  • CPU freq now to 1512000, as it should be. Also a slight UV

File Changes

Patch Links:

https://github.com/htc-msm8660/android_kernel_htc_msm8660/pull/1.patch

@homeslice976
Copy link
Author

Absolutely - change what you need. I had users running this way on all variants for a few weeks and there didn't seem to be any trouble, and users who were on the Raider/Velocity did not report anything out of the ordinary - but I'm happy to let the experts clean it up any way necessary!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants