Skip to content

Princeton COS 424 final project: Predicting Supreme Court Decisions

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

hinthornw/supreme_predictions

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

51 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Predicting the Decisions of Supreme Court Justices

Authors: William Hinthorn, Maia Ezratty, Mihika Kapoor, Alice Zheng

COS 424 Final Project

For more notes, see our wiki.

A pdf copy of our findings is stored here.

Dataset: Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Jeffrey A. Segal, Theodore J. Ruger, and Sara C. Benesh. 2016 Supreme Court Database, Version 2016 Release 01. URL: http://Supremecourtdatabase.org

To download the dataset, go to the website and download the case-centered csv file.

The dataset contains of 8,737 cases with the following headers:

caseId, docketId, caseIssuesId, voteId, dateDecision, decisionType, usCite, sctCite, ledCite, lexisCite, term, naturalCourt, chief, docket, caseName, dateArgument, dateRearg, petitioner, petitionerState, respondent, respondentState, jurisdiction, adminAction, adminActionState, threeJudgeFdc, caseOrigin, caseOriginState, caseSource, caseSourceState, lcDisagreement, certReason, lcDisposition, lcDispositionDirection, declarationUncon, caseDisposition, partyWinning, precedentAlteration, voteUnclear, issue, issueArea, decisionDirection, decisionDirectionDissent, authorityDecision1, authorityDecision2, lawType, lawSupp, lawMinor, majOpinWriter, majOpinAssigner, splitVote, majVotes, and minVotes

The second dataset is justice centered (same source).

It has field names: caseId, docketId, caseIssuesId, voteId, dateDecision, decisionType, usCite, sctCite, ledCite, lexisCite, term, naturalCourt, chief, docket, caseName, dateArgument, dateRearg, petitioner, petitionerState, respondent, respondentState, jurisdiction, adminAction, adminActionState, threeJudgeFdc, caseOrigin, caseOriginState, caseSource, caseSourceState, lcDisagreement, certReason, lcDisposition, lcDispositionDirection, declarationUncon, caseDisposition, caseDispositionUnusual, partyWinning, precedentAlteration, voteUnclear, issue, issueArea, decisionDirection, decisionDirectionDissent, authorityDecision1, authorityDecision2, lawType, lawSupp, lawMinor, majOpinWriter, majOpinAssigner, splitVote, majVotes, minVotes, justice, justiceName, vote, opinion, direction, majority, firstAgreement, secondAgreement,

We used feature selection, generation, and ranom forests classifiers to build a flexible model which predicts the decisions of the court with an average accuracy of ~80-90%. We obtained similar results by building dedicated models for individual justices.

Here are some cool findings:

We found out that judges tend to stay true to their original biases throughout the length of their term.

biases

Except for a few outliers, like Harry Blackmun, who we assume was influenced by the world wars and the New Deal programs to turn an early conservative Justice into an liberally-minded older man. Note that the moderates tend to have shorter terms (though we do not imply any health benefits of having a political bias).

These biases play a huge role on the bias of the court at large. We show the cumulative sum of justice's voting biases spread out over the cases that are included within the dataset.

biases_temporal

We looked at correlations in voting habits of justices over the length of the term covered by the modern dataset (seen below)

Covariences

And generated features based on clustering methods:

minMaj biasVec

We then used textual data from CourtListener and correlated bags of words with political bias of the individual Justice using there $\chi^2$ values. Below are some word clouds representing our findings.

The first two show words that are strongly correlated with a justice being in the majority vote (left) or dissent (right).

direction majority

The next two show words strongly correlated with a Justice voting in along a more liberal line (left) or conservative one (right)

conservative consMaj

About

Princeton COS 424 final project: Predicting Supreme Court Decisions

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published