Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/675 on chain ouis devaddrs #435

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bryzettler
Copy link

Oui and Devadders are moving onchain.

All write commands will be interacting directly with the solana blockchain via a solana_client now.

@@ -43,14 +42,18 @@ enum action_v1 {
// Define an organisation
message org_v1 {
uint64 oui = 1;
// On chain address
bytes address = 2;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can't change this proto like this without breaking any existing clients. we can add fields and that should be relatively safe for the old stuff to handle but changing the order of existing fields or adding fields in order ahead of existing fields will need an org_v2 message to avoid a breaking change. unless we want to consider updating the "official cli" and the client in the iot oracles the only priority and let any other consumers deal with the fallout.

maybe that's acceptable in this special case since the shift to solana for apis using this particular data structure are going to be broken without an update no matter what ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point actually, we need to decide if we want to v2 or nuke v1? I think we would be broken no matter what but maybe we v2, deprecate v1 and remove it at a later date.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only reason I don’t think it’s straightforward is b/c there are still methods that return that data structure that by the proto spec would be expected to still work

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah the data structure is going to change completely once we do the shift. I can do the v2 and deprecate v1 if thats the consensus?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fair to me

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Think I deprecated it properly, lemme know if thats how we want to do it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants